skip to main |
skip to sidebar
Embassies of Poland, Hungary, Slovakia and Austria use the irrational interpretation of Vatican Council II with the false premise, inference and conclusion: clarfication needed.
Embassies of Poland, Hungary, Slovakia and Austria use the irrational interpretation of Vatican Council II with the false premise, inference and conclusion: clarfication needed.
-Lionel Andrades
Cardinal Ratzinger's Professio Fidei is based upon the use of the
irrational premise,inference and conclusion in the interpretation of
magisterial documents including Vatican Council
https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2020/02/cardinal-ratzingers-professio-fidei-is.html
Fr.Hunwicke,Brother Alex Bugnolo,Louie Verrecchio and Ann Barnhardt
interpret Vatican Council II with the irrational premise, inference and
conclusion to contradict the Athanasius Creed on outside the Church
there is no salvation
https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2020/02/frhunwickebrother-alex-bugnololouie.html
Cardinal Ratzinger and Cardinal Schonborn interpreted Vatican Council II
with the irrational premise, inference and conclusion and then put
together the Catechism of the Catholic Church(1994).Though the Catechism
is Cushingie for them we can interpret it with Feeneyism i.e the
rational premise, inference and conclusion.
https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2020/02/cardinal-ratzinger-and-cardinal.html
50 years of Vatican Council II - drama is over : the Council, EENS,
Creeds, Catechisms and BOD, BOB and I.I can be interpreted rationally
https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2020/02/50-years-of-vatican-council-ii-drama-is.html
Michael Sean Winters, Massimo Faggioli, John Allen jr and Joshua
McElwee agree that even though Yves Congar, Karl Rahner, Richard
Cushing and Joseph Ratzinger were there at Vatican Council II. the
Council can be interpreted with the rational premise, inference and
conclusion. Then it will be in harmony with the past exclusivist
ecclesiology of the Church, an ecumenism of return and 16th century
extra ecclesiam nulla salus(EENS), with no known exceptions. None of
them are disputing this.
https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2020/02/michael-sean-winters-massimo-faggioli.html
It is not orthodoxy when Roberto dei Mattei interprets the baptism of
desire(BOD), baptism of blood(BOB) and invincible ignorance(I.I) with a
fake premise, inference and conclusion to create a rupture with 16th
century extra ecclesiam nulla salus(EENS). For me EENS has no
exceptions. For him BOD, BOB and I.I are exceptions to EENS.
https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2020/02/incomplete-it-is-not-orthodoxy-when.html
Rome Life Forum 2020 speakers interpret BOD, BOB and I.I and Vatican
Council II with the false premise, inference and conclusion to create a
rupture with the Syllabus of Errors of Pope Pius IX.
https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2020/02/rome-life-forum-2020-speakers-interpret_11.html
All the speakers at the Rome Forum 2020 need to interpret Vatican
Council II, the Creeds and Catechisms, EENS and BOD, BOB and I.I without
the irrational premise, inference and conclusion to create a
hermeneutic of continuity with Tradition.
https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2020/02/all-speakers-at-rome-forum-2020-need-to.html
Rome Life Forum 2020 speakers use an irrational premise, inference and
conclusion to interpret the Catechism of the Catholic Church (1994) to
create a rupture with Tradition ( EENS, Syllabus of Errors of Pius IX,
Catechism of Pope Pius X etc).
https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2020/02/rome-life-forum-2020-speakers-use.html
Bishop Donald Sanborn, Bishop Daniel Dolan , Fr. Anthony Cekada and
Michael and Peter Dimond interpret the Catechism of Pope Pius X with an
irrational premise and conclusion : they make the same mistake with
Vatican Council II.
https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2020/02/bishop-donald-sanborn-bishop-daniel.html
Rome Life Forum 2020 speakers interpret Vatican Council II with the
irrational premise, inference and conclusion to create a false rupture
with Tradition, the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus, the Syllabus of
Errors, the Athanasius Creed etc.
https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2020/02/rome-life-forum-2020-speakers-interpret.html
Lepanto Foundation,Correspondenza Romano, Radici
Cristiane,RadioRomalibera of Roberto dei Mattei do not rationally
interpret Vatican Council II, the Creeds and Catechisms, EENS, BOD, BOB
and I.I and the Catechism of Pope Pius X : an irrational premise,
inference and conclusion is used.
https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2020/02/lepanto-foundationcorrespondenza-romano.html
All the USCCB-approved books on Vatican Council II are based upon this model
https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2020/02/all-usccb-approved-books-on-vatican.html
Ignatius Press- approved books follow this model
https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2020/02/ignatius-press-approved-books-follow.html
Angelus Press-approved books also follow this model
https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2020/02/angelus-press-approved-books-also.html
St.John Lateran University library for research on Vatican Council II
follows this model : all the books on Vatican Council II are written
with a false premise
https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2020/02/stjohn-lateran-university-library-for.html
Pope Francis' books also follow this model : They interpret the Council with the false premise, inference and conclusion.
https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2020/02/pope-francis-books-also-follow-this.html
Fr.Aidan Nicols O.P and all the Dominicans' approved books follow this model
https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2020/02/fraidan-nicols-op-and-all-dominicans.html
Posts
No comments:
Post a Comment