skip to main |
skip to sidebar
George Weigel a Catholic American author, political analyst, and social activist serves as a Senior Fellow of the Ethics and Public Policy Center and he has been informed that he uses the irrational premise, inference and conclusion to liberally interpret Vatican Council II. He has a rational choice which he overlooks.I have mentioned this to him and other scholars of the Center through e-mails over the last few months.They, it seems, would prefer to continue to interpret Vatican Council II with the false premise and inference to create a non traditional conclusion, which would be in keeping with the public policy of the Left which they suppport.
George Weigel a Catholic American author, political analyst, and social activist serves as a Senior Fellow of the Ethics and Public Policy Center and he has been informed that he uses the irrational premise, inference and conclusion to liberally interpret Vatican Council II. He has a rational choice which he overlooks.I have mentioned this to him and other scholars of the Center through e-mails over the last few months.They, it seems, would prefer to continue to interpret Vatican Council II with the false premise and inference to create a non traditional conclusion, which would be in keeping with the public policy of the Left which they suppport.
-Lionel Andrades
Fr. David Koonce, LC,Dean of Theology and Fr. Alex Yeung, LC, Dean of Philosophy, University Pontifical Regina Apostolorum, (UPRA), Rome use the false premise, inference and conclusion to interpret Vatican Council II and other magisterial documents. So an artificial rupture is created with Catholic Tradition.It would be the same with the Grand Chancellor of UPRA, Fr.John Connor LC and the Rector Fr.José E. Oyarzún, L.C
Italian Government finances Alberto Melloni's Bologna School with a million euros annually : it uses a false premise, inference and conclusion to interpret Vatican Council II as a rupture with Tradition
Mons. Marco Gnarvi at the Vicariate, Rome does not use the rational model to interpret Vatican Council II but chooses the irrational version.He is the Parish Priest at the church Santa Maria in Trastevere, Rome. In inter-religious dialogue and ecumenism he uses the false premise, inference and conclusion to interpret Vatican Council II. This is a fake version. It's use is unethical.He projects Vatican Council II without the rational interpretation of the Council.
Posts
No comments:
Post a Comment