There is no denial from PISAI.They use the irrational premise, inference and conclusion to interpret Vatican Council II, the Catechisms and Creeds, the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus(EENS) and other magisterial teachings. They know that there is nothing in Vatican Council II to contradict the strict interpretation of the dogma EENS.LG 8, LG 14, LG 16, UR 3, NA 2, GS 22 etc, refer to only hypothetical and speculative cases in 1965-2020.So they are not exceptions to the traditional teaching on the Catholic Church having exclusive salvation.
The teaching at the Pontificial Institute of Arab and Islamic Studies (PISAI) in Rome was wrong over the last 55 years, since Vatican Council II.They were also wrong over the last 81 years, when the Letter of the Holy Office 1949, was officially issued during the pontificate of Pope Pius XII.
According to Vatican Council II all need faith and baptism for salvation (AG 7).Mohammad and Muslims do not have it.They are all oriented to Hell with no known exceptions is the official teaching of the Catholic Church, according to Vatican Council II(AG 7).This is the Concliar teaching and not just a pre-Vatican Council II teaching, with the Council interpreted irrationally.
This is not the interpretation however of the professors at PISAI who project Islamism as an equal path to salvation as the Catholic Church.
For Catholics the Koran is heretical and Mohammad could not be a prophet of God.This is the Catholic teaching in Ad Gentes 7 the Creeds, Catechisms and the dogma EENS.This is the interpretation of the Bible ( John 3:5, Mark 16:16).
PISAI does not teach that Muslims need to be members of the Catholic Church with Catholic faith( Athanasius Creed) for salvation( to avoid Hell).
The last time I was at PISAI there was a Muslim guest speaker who said he admired Maulana Fazlur Rehman of the Jamaat Islami in Pakistan. He has been associated with the Taleban in Afghanisation.
He was indirectly telling the teaching staff that he believed in exclusive salvation being there in only his religion and that all need to affirm not only God but also his prophet for salvation.
However the teaching staff at PISAI, scholars, do not choose to interpret Vatican Council II interpreted without the irrational premise, inference and conclusion, before their guest speakers.The meetings appear like a social occasion only.
They use the false premise, inference and conclusion to project invisible cases of the baptism of desire(BOD),baptism of blood(BOB) and invincible ignorance(I.I) as being visible exceptions to EENS.
Similarly they project invisible cases of LG 8, LG 14, LG 16, UR 3, NA 2, GS 22 etc , in 2020, as being objective exceptions to the Athanasius Creed and the Catechism of Pope Pius X ( 24 Q, 27 Q).
So they make a false Profession of Faith by confusing hypothetical cases (LG 8, LG 14, LG 16) as rejecting the Creeds, Catechisms and the dogma EENS.This is not the Deposit of Faith but a rejection of it.
PISAI, with its irrational premise, inference and conclusion, make magisterial documents non magisterial and then project this error among the scholars whom they invite.
When they organise visits to the mosque in Rome they need to clarify that the Imam and personell there at the Cultural Center, do not have Catholic faith and the baptism of water(AG 7, LG 14) and so will not be saved from the fires of Hell.
Instead the Teaching Staff and visiting scholars use Vatican Council II as a slogan.They interpret the Council irrationally and then project it as a ruputure with Catholic Tradition and the teaching of the popes and saints, over the centuries, on the subject of other religions.
Like Pope Benedict and his Regensburg Address, PISAI Staff would refer to Nostra Aetate with no reference to Ad Gentes 7, which is mentioned in the Catechism of the Catholic Church(n.846) under the sub title Outside the Church No Salvation.
Instead they knowingly interpret Vatican Council II with the irrational premise.This is unethical and deceptive.
We can choose to live at peace with all people, respect them and expect them to also tolerate our Catholic beliefs.
At the recent meeting in Bari, with Pope Francis, all the bishops present there, would interpret Vatican Council II with the false premise, inference and conclusion, like at PISAI.-Lionel Andrades
February 23, 2020
Poor scholarship at PISAI
https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2020/02/poor-scholarship-at-pisai.html
Il prof. Bartolomeo Pirone, docente invitato del PISAI, il 23 gennaio 2020, presso la Libreria Terra Santa di Milano, ha presentato la sua recente pubblicazione dal titolo Infedeli. I cristiani sotto il dominio dell’islam, da Maometto al XX secolo,
Edizioni Terra Santa 2019. Si tratta di un saggio che riassume anni di
studi e di ricerche sul tema, alla luce di testimonianze di storici
arabi, diretti e autorevoli testimoni delle diverse fasi di convivenza
tra musulmani e cristiani. L’opera ha l’intento di favorire la
comprensione delle dinamiche caratterizzanti gli episodi di attualità
che spesso sconvolgono i criteri di giudizio sul fenomeno della presenza
dell’islam in mezzo a noi. Un’opera, in poche parole, che faccia
chiarezza sul passato, per aiutare a decifrare il presente.
Il 24 gennaio 2020, sempre a Milano, nella sede della Veneranda Biblioteca Ambrosiana, Sala delle Accademie, Bartolomeo Pirone ha partecipato in qualità di relatore al convegno Il Levante Cristiano, giornata di studio sul Libano e sulla Siria a partire dalla pubblicazione di due monografie della collana Studia Orientalia Christiana, Edizioni Terra Santa 2019. L’intervento del prof. Pirone era intitolato Francescani e Maroniti.
https://en.pisai.it/the-pisai/news/2020/february/bartolome-pirone-presenta-il-suo-libro/
https://twitter.com/IstitutoPisai?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw%7Ctwcamp%5Eembeddedtimeline%7Ctwterm%5Eprofile%3AIstitutoPisai&ref_url=https%3A%2F%2Fen.pisai.it%2Fthe-pisai%2Fpisais-golden-jubilee%2F
Posts
No comments:
Post a Comment