A Jewish Left organisation which interprets Vatican Council II with the false premise, inference and conclusion 1, recently gave Pope Francis an award. The pope interprets the Council just like them.Otherwise he would not be eligible for the prize.Since if magisterial documents were interpreted rationally, he would be saying that all Jews need to convert into the Catholic Church, for salvation.Since there would be nothing in Vatican Council II to contradict extra ecclesiam nulla salus(EENS) and Ad Gentes 7 which says all need faith and baptism for salvation.The past ecclesiology would be intact.
So Pope Francis pleases the Masons and the Left and accepts the award and interprets the Council just like them.
If Pope Francis chose the following rational model 2 to interpret Vatican Council II, then it would mean the cardinals and bishops would be able to offer Holy Mass in Latin or Italian, with the old ecclesiology of the Catholic Church.The old ecclesiology would not be contradicted any more .
So Cardinal Matteo Zuppi, Archbishop of Bologna, would offer Holy Mass in Italian affirming outside the Church there is no salvation.When Cardinal Raymond Burke would offer Holy Mass in Latin, he also would be affirming outside the Church there is no salvation.
But now the popes, cardinals and bishops use the irrational model to interpret the Creeds and Catechisms, and this creates the New Theology, Cushingite theology, the common Rahner-Ratzinger theology taught at the pontifical universities , which are approved by the liberal, left rabbis.
When Pope Francis uses the rational model he would be saying outside the Church there is no salvation. Every one needs to be a Catholic to avoid Hell.So the priority to avoid Hell is 'faith and baptism'(AG 7) in the Catholic Church.Then it is important for the political government to be Catholic, to save souls from going to Hell.There must not be a rupture between Church and State.
It would also mean that the Lutherans are outside the Church without Catholic faith and the baptism of water in the Catholic Church.
The rational model supports the proclamation of the Social Reign of Christ the King.
Organisations that want a secular state do not use the rational model.The John XXIII Foundation for Religious Sciences (FSCIRE), also known as the Bologna School is funded by
the Italian government.It's director is the historian Alberto Melloni and he is not going to choose the rational model.Similarly the ecumenical monastic Community of Bose established by Catholic layman Enzo Bianchi in Italy can not use the rational model. Since it would be saying that the non Catholic Christians in the community are outside the Church and on the way to Hell. The Sant Egidio community of Andrea Riccardi chooses to interpret Vatican Council II, the Creeds and Catechisms and EENS with the false premise, inference and conclusion.Since their conclusion is outside the Church there is salvation these communities reject traditional mission and the proclamation of the Social Reign of Christ the King in law and politics.They support the non separation of Satanic secularism and State and the separation of the Catholic religion and the State. They would all be eligible for the award given to the pope.
With the change in the understanding of the Creeds and Catechisms, Vatican Council II, EENS, Profession of Faith, the baptism of desire, baptism of blood and invincible ignorance etc- Pope Francis and Pope Benedict, like Pope Paul VI, are telling us that they reject Vatican Council I ( I repeat Vatican Council 1) on the infallibility of the pope ex cathedra.
Pope Paul VI chose to interpret Vatican Council II with Cushingism instead of Feeneyism and accepted the 1949 Letter of the Holy Office (LOHO) with its irrational premise, inference and conclusion.May be he acted in ignorance.Archbishop Marcel Lefebvre and Cardinal Karol Wojtyla could also have been in ignorance.So they did not correct Pope Paul VI on his use of Cushingism instead of traditional and rational Feeneyism, to interpret the Council.
The dogma EENS and the Creeds are infallible teachings of the Catholic Church and they cannot be changed or rejected. The Athanasius Creed is rejected and the understanding of the Nicene Creeds has been changed with the irrationa premise, inference and conclusion.-Lionel Andrades
The dogma EENS and the Creeds are infallible teachings of the Catholic Church and they cannot be changed or rejected. The Athanasius Creed is rejected and the understanding of the Nicene Creeds has been changed with the irrationa premise, inference and conclusion.-Lionel Andrades
1
2
Posts
No comments:
Post a Comment