Simcha Fischer uses the false premise to interpret the Creeds, Catechisms and Vatican Council II and does not call herself, the CDF and the bishops of Manchester and Worcester, schismatics

When Brother Thomas Augustine MICM, Superior, Slaves of the Immaculate Heart of Mary, St.Benedict Center, Still River, MA, USA received full canonical status as a religious community it was because he accepted Vatican Council II(Cushingite), the Council intepreted with the false premise. The original agreement mentioned the acceptance of Vatican Council II. It did not clarify if it was Vatican Council II without the false premise.

Later the words Vatican Council II were removed from the text of the agreement, with the Diocese of Manchester, USA, shown on the Internet.Now Brother Thomas Augustine does not deny that Vatican Council II ( Cushingite) negates extra ecclesiam nulla salus(Feeneyite), the Athanasius Creed and other Magisterial documents which support extra ecclesiam nulla salus(EENS), in the Catholic Church.

There is   pressure on the St. Benedict Center, New Hamphsire,where Brother Andre Marie MICM, is the Prior, to interpret Vatican Council II with the irrationality and so create exceptions for EENS.The baptism of desire, baptism of blood and invincible ignorance would be literal and objective exceptions. This would be the false but approved, narrative.

So the theology of the St. Benedict Center, Still River is liberal like that at the Novus Ordo Mass in general. The SBC offer the Latin Mass  with the new ecclesiology. They are in schism with the popes over the centuries, who affirmed the strict interpretation of EENS with BOD,BOB and I.I just being hypothetical and theoretical.
So for Brother Thomas Augustine, Mystici Corporis, Quanta Cura and other magisterial documents which mention BOD, BOB and I.I would contradict EENS, as being visible and known exceptions. So he would read the past Church documents with Cushingism and not Feeneyism, with the false premise and not without it.
This is the new ecclesiology of the priests at the St. Benedict Center, Still River.It is the same for the FSSP priests who offer the Latin Mass.

They do not say that they affirm Vatican Council II without the false premise.If they endorsed Vatican Council II without the false premise  they would be supporting Feeneyite EENS( with no exceptions) and so would lose their full communion status.
Bishop Robert McManus, Bishop of Manchester, like Pope Francis, interprets Vatican Council II, the Creeds and Catechisms with the false premise. This is approved by the Jewish Left for the Catholic Church.

Simcha Fischer has written an article supporting the St. Benedict Center, Still River and criticizing the St. Benedict Center N.H. She uses the false premise to interpret the Creeds, Catechisms and Vatican Council II and does not call herself, the CDF and the bishops of Manchester and Worcester, schismatics.-Lionel Andrades

APRIL 11, 2015

No text in Quanto Conficiamur Moerore or the Council of Trent says there are exceptions to the traditional interpretation of the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salushttp://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2015/04/no-text-in-quanto-conficiamur-moerore.html

JULY 14, 2015

Vatican Council II (UR ,DH) would contradict Mortalium Animos, Quanta Cura, Syllabus of Errors only if B is an exception to A

http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2015/07/vatican-council-ii-ur-dh-would.html

MARCH 2, 2015

The Council of Trent, Mystici Corporis no where says that these cases are exceptions to the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus : Rome made a mistake in 1949

http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2015/03/the-council-of-trent-mystici-corporis.html

Fr.Leonard Feeney's communities like Peter Vere interpret Vatican Council II with an irrationality

http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2015/07/frleonard-feeneys-communities-like.html

It is a fact of life that we cannot see or know exceptions to the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus.It is not just my opinion
http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2015/01/it-is-fact-of-life-that-we-cannot-see_1.html

APRIL 8, 2013

This is what the SSPX and the St.Benedict Centers must agree on.The baptism of desire and baptism of blood are irrelevant to the literal interpretation of the dogma according to Fr. Leonard Feeney.

https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2013/04/this-is-what-sspx-and-stbenedict.html

MARCH 19, 2013

SBC, SSPX, FSSP ANNOUNCE THAT WE CANNOT NAME ANY PERSON WHO IS AN EXCEPTION TO EXTRA ECCLESIAM NULLA SALUS AND VATICAN COUNCIL II https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2013/03/sbc-sspx-fssp-could-announce-that-we.html

 OCTOBER 30, 2019

Bishop Peter Libasci and the Chancellor want scientists in New Hampshire, to interpret Vatican Council II by violating Newton's Laws of physics.This is a credibility issue.For a doctor, engineer, lawyer or priest to confuse what is invisible as being being visible, even after being informed, indicates his sense of reality is different from the rest of mankind.

https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2019/10/bishop-peter-libasci-and-chancellor.html

OCTOBER 29, 2019

The 16 books of Vatican Council II have an error. They violate the Principle of Non Contradiction. The Council Fathers misunderstood the laws of physics. They wrongly assumed the baptism of desire(BOD), baptism of blood(BOB) and being saved in invincible ignorance(I.I) referred to physical bodies in time and space. They they created a new false theology based upon this irrationality. This cannot be magisterial but is human error. Since the Holy Spirit cannot make a factual and objective error.

https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2019/10/the-16-books-of-vatican-council-ii-have.html

OCTOBER 28, 2019

All the books on Vatican Council II that have been published could probably have an error in the interpretation of the Council, in its 16 basic documents.Lumen Gentium, Nostra Aetate,Ad Gentes, Unitatitis Redintigratio, Gaudium et Specs etc were are all interpreted with a false premise to create an artificial rupture with Tradition. Hypotheticals were assumed to be objective people saved outside the Church.

https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2019/10/all-books-on-vatican-council-ii-that.html

JANUARY 25, 2019

For me the red does not contradict the blue so there is a hermeneutic of continuity with Tradition ( Graphics)

https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2019/01/for-me-red-does-not-contrradict-blue-so.html

JUNE 29, 2019

Fr Matteo Visioli Undersecretary of the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith (CDF) has ordered that all religious communities interpret Vatican Council II and other magisterial documents with the red being an exception to the blue. This is obligatory also for the Franciscans of the Immaculate. They are not permitted to interpret the Council with the red not being an exception to the blue.

 Fr Matteo Visioli  Undersecretary of the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith (CDF) has  ordered that all religious communities interpret Vatican Council II and other magisterial  documents with the red being an exception to the blue. This is obligatory also for  the Franciscans of the Immaculate. They are not permitted to interpret the Council with the red not being an exception to the blue.

-Lionel Andrades

Ad Gentes 7, Vatican Council II

 Therefore, all must be converted to Him, made known by the Church's preaching, and all must be incorporated into Him by baptism and into the Church which is His body. For Christ Himself "by stressing in express language the necessity of faith and baptism (cf. Mark 16:16; John 3:5), at the same time confirmed the necessity of the Church, into which men enter by baptism, as by a door. Therefore those men cannot be saved, who though aware that God, through Jesus Christ founded the Church as something necessary, still do not wish to enter into it, or to persevere in it." Therefore though God in ways known to Himself can lead those inculpably ignorant of the Gospel to find that faith without which it is impossible to please Him...- Ad Gentes 7. Vatican Council II

Lumen Gentium 14, Vatican Council II

14. This Sacred Council wishes to turn its attention firstly to the Catholic faithful. Basing itself upon Sacred Scripture and Tradition, it teaches that the Church, now sojourning on earth as an exile, is necessary for salvation. Christ, present to us in His Body, which is the Church, is the one Mediator and the unique way of salvation. In explicit terms He Himself affirmed the necessity of faith and baptism(124) and thereby affirmed also the necessity of the Church, for through baptism as through a door men enter the Church. Whosoever, therefore, knowing that the Catholic Church was made necessary by Christ, would refuse to enter or to remain in it, could not be saved.
They are fully incorporated in the society of the Church who, possessing the Spirit of Christ accept her entire system and all the means of salvation given to her, and are united with her as part of her visible bodily structure and through her with Christ, who rules her through the Supreme Pontiff and the bishops. The bonds which bind men to the Church in a visible way are profession of faith, the sacraments, and ecclesiastical government and communion. He is not saved, however, who, though part of the body of the Church, does not persevere in charity. He remains indeed in the bosom of the Church, but, as it were, only in a "bodily" manner and not "in his heart."(12*) All the Church's children should remember that their exalted status is to be attributed not to their own merits but to the special grace of Christ. If they fail moreover to respond to that grace in thought, word and deed, not only shall they not be saved but they will be the more severely judged.(13*)
Catechumens who, moved by the Holy Spirit, seek with explicit intention to be incorporated into the Church are by that very intention joined with her. With love and solicitude Mother Church already embraces them as her own.- Lumen Gentium 14, Vatican Council II