eucharistandmission: MHFM uses the false premise to interpret Vatican Council II

Tuesday, July 14, 2020

MHFM uses the false premise to interpret Vatican Council II

From the Most Holy Family Monastery website

Christ’s Body

I find your narrow, Pharisaical determination as to who is a member of Christ's Mystical body and who is not, to be presumptuous and hateful.

T G

MHFM: Our position on who is a member of Christ's body is based on Catholic teaching. Thus, by your words you have denounced the Church's teaching. That makes you a heretic and puts you out of Christ's body.

Pope Leo XIII, Satis Cognitum (# 9), 1896: “St. Augustine notes that other heresies may spring up, to a single one of which, should any one give his assent, he is by the very fact cut off from Catholic unity. “No one who merely disbelieves in all (these heresies) can for that reason regard himself as a Catholic or call himself one. For there may be or may arise some other heresies, which are not set out in this work of ours, and, if any one holds to one single one of these he is not a Catholic” (S. Augustinus, De Haeresibus, n. 88).

Pope Pius XII, Mystici Corporis Christi (# 22), June 29, 1943: “Actually only those are to be included as members of the Church who have received the laver of regeneration and profess the true faith…”

Pope Pius XII, Mystici Corporis Christi (# 23), June 29, 1943: “For not every offense, although it may be a grave evil, is such as by its very own nature [suapte natura] to sever a man from the Body of the Church [ab Ecclesiae Corpore], as does schism or heresy or apostasy.”

https://www.mostholyfamilymonastery.com/E-Exchanges.php?utm_source=WPhp&utm_medium=Recent&utm_campaign=Theme2020

The Most Holy Family Monastery (MHFM) use the false premise to interpret Vatican Council II.

So there is a rupture with extra ecclesiam nulla salus(EENS). This would be heresy?

There is a rupture with the past popes on EENS.This would be schism?

-Lionel Andrades