If the Lefebvrist traditionalists interpreted Vatican Council II without the false premise and so would have to affirm the strict interpretation of extra ecclesiam nulla salus(EENS), this would divide them.Many would prefer to their careers,life style and reputation instead of proclaiming the Faith with possible persecution.
Now when they interpret Vatican Council II with the false premise they can deny the strict interpretation of EENS and like the liberals place the blame on Vatican Council II.
If they made the distinction between Vatican Council II with the premise or without it, they would be exposed.
Michael Matt at the Remnant has another 'one of those' interviews of Vigano in which he interprets Vatican Council II with the false premise,like the Left and so is not opposed.
What if Vigano and Matt re-interpreted Vatican Council II without the false premise? The Council would emerge in harmony with EENS and the rest of Tradition.They would be opposed by the Left. So for now they have protected their worldly interests.-Lionel Andrades
Posts
No comments:
Post a Comment