Why does Archbishop Carlo Vigano not call for the interpretation of Vatican Council II without the false premise, which would be a return to the traditional teaching on exclusive salvation in the Church ( Athanasius Creed etc) which was the basis for the proclamation of the Social Reign of Christ the King in all political legislation ?

 Why does not Archbishop Carlo Vigano call for the interpretation of Vatican Council II without the false premise, which would be a return to the traditional teaching on exclusive salvation in the Church ( Athanasius Creed etc) which was the basis for the proclamation of the Social Reign of Christ the King in all political legislation ? -Lionel Andrades