In the debate ( original video ) Chris Ferrara and Mark Shea were interpreting Magisterial documents with a false premise.

  

In the debate ( original video ) Chris Ferrara and Mark Shea were interpreting Magisterial documents  with a false premise. - Lionel Andrades   

OCTOBER 19, 2018

Repost : Chris Ferrara - Mark Shea debate : both are theologically rejecting the dogma EENS

https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2018/10/repost-chris-ferrara-mark-shea-debate.html

FEBRUARY 19, 2016

Neither Chris Ferrara or Mark Shea were affirming the Feeneyite position on extra ecclesiam nulla salus

Comments from The Eponymous Flower : Ferrara vs. Shea Debate-- Mark Shea Must be a Feeneyite Now!

Chris Ferrara Vs Mark Shea
http://www.aotmclub.com/index.asp?pageID=18 

Chris Ferrara unknowingly uses an irrational premise and supports magisterial heresy
http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2016/02/chris-ferrara-unknowingly-uses.html

There can be mission Ad Gentes with Feeneyism or Cushingism. We can choose.For Pope Francis and the Jesuits it is mission with Cushingism
http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2016/02/their-can-be-mission-ad-gentes-with.html

OCTOBER 19, 2018

Repost : When Chris Ferrara wrote The Great Facade he did not know Vatican Council II could be interpreted without the irrational premise and the conclusion would be different  https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2018/10/repost-when-chris-ferrara-wrote-great.html