The Letter of the Holy Office 1949 to the Archbishop of Boston assumes unknown cases of the baptism of desire and invincible ignorance are known and objective exceptions t Feeneyite extra ecclesiam nulla salus(EENS).This is an objective mistake. The Letter of the Holy Office 1949(LOHO) is referenced in Vatican Council II.This was a mistake of Pope Paul VI and the Council Fathers (1965). The LOHO is referenced in the Catechism of the Catholic Church.This was the mistake of Pope John Paul II and Cardinal Joseph Ratzinger. The factual mistake in LOHO was overlooked by Pope Pius XII and Pope John XXIII. It was also not noted by Cardinal Ottaviani and Archbishop Marcel Lefebvre. Now there are two interpretations of Vatican Council II -Pope Francis' and mine.

 The Letter of the Holy Office 1949 to the Archbishop of Boston assumes unknown cases of the baptism of desire and invincible ignorance are known and objective exceptions to Feeneyite extra ecclesiam nulla salus(EENS).This is an objective mistake. The Letter of the Holy Office 1949(LOHO) is referenced in Vatican Council II.This was a mistake of Pope Paul VI and the Council Fathers (1965).

The LOHO is referenced in the Catechism of the Catholic Church.This was the mistake of Pope John Paul II and Cardinal Joseph Ratzinger.

The factual mistake in LOHO was overlooked by Pope Pius XII and Pope John XXIII.

It was also not noted by Cardinal Ottaviani and Archbishop Marcel Lefebvre.

Now there are two interpretations of Vatican Council II-Pope Francis' and mine.

-Lionel Andrades