Michael and Peter Dimond at the Most Holy Family Monastery, USA have posted this video on St. Robert Bellarmine and the baptism of desire and they have not pointed out that the baptism of desire(BOD) refers to only invisible cases in 1965-2020 and Lumen Gentium 14( BOD) in Vatican Council II is not a rupture with their interpretation of extra ecclesiam nulla salus (EENS). They are still interpreting Vatican Council II as a rupture with EENS. This is the same mistake made by the rest of the Church whom they refer to as the 'Vatican II sect'. Vatican Council II can no more be the basis for sedevacantism when it is interpreted rationally

Michael and Peter Dimond at the Most Holy Family Monastery, USA  have posted this video  on St. Robert Bellarmine and the baptism of desire and they have not pointed out that the baptism of desire(BOD)  refers to only invisible cases  in 1965-2020 and Lumen Gentium 14( BOD) in Vatican Council II is not a rupture with their interpretation of extra ecclesiam nulla salus (EENS).

They are still interpreting Vatican Council II as a rupture with EENS. This is the same mistake made by the rest of the Church whom they refer to as the 'Vatican II sect'.

Vatican Council II can no more be the basis for sedevacantism when it is interpreted rationally..-Lionel Andrades