Massimo Faggioli needs to clarify that Vatican Council II does not contradict Tradition ( EENS, Syllabus of Errors etc) for him any more

 Massimo Faggioli needs to clarify for all that the baptism of desire, baptism of blood and invincible ignorance refer to hypothetical and theoretical cases only in 1965-2021.

Similarly he needs to clarify that for him LG 8, LG 14, LG 16, UR 3, NA 2, GS 22 etc in Vatican Council II are also only hypothetical and  speculative cases in the present times. So there are no objective exceptions , mentioned in Vatican Council II, to the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus according to the Jesuits in the Middle Ages. There are no objective exceptions mentioned in Vatican Council II and the Catechism of the Catholic Church to the Syllabus of Errors. 

So for him the Ccuncil does not contradict Tradition any more.

It does not contradict Feeneyite EENS of the St.Benedict Center, New Hampshire. It does not contradict EENS according to Fr. Leonard Feeney of Boston whose excommunication was lifted by that great exponent of Vatican Council II, Pope Paul VI.The Jesuit priest only had to recite the Athanasius Creed, which says outside the Church there is no salvation.-Lionel Andrades

FEBRUARY 14, 2021

Massimo Faggioli knows that Vatican Council II can be interpreted with or without the false premise and the conclusion will be non traditional or traditional, in a rupture or in harmony, with extra ecclesiam nulla salus (EENS) according to the Magisterium of the 16th century. So he now chooses to interpret Vatican Council II rationally. He is a full Professor of Theology and Religious Studies at Villanova University, USA and needs to inform them and the organisations he is associated with, of his new understanding of Vatican Council II

https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2021/02/massimo-faggioli-knows-that-vatican.html