Sanborn and Fastiggi's interpretation of Vatican Council II is now obsolete

 In the debate on Ecclesiology between Bishop Donald Sanborn and Prof. Robert Fastiggi the latter accused the former of being in schism and said schism was a bad thing.The sedevacantist bishop asked how could they be in Tradition when they were following Tradition and not Vatican Council II.He could have been implying that Fastiggi was in schism with his acceptance of Vatican Council II.

But really both of them were using a false premise to interpret Vatican Council II and so create schism  with the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus, the Athanasius Creed and the Syllabus of Errors.Theologicall they were projecting exceptions.

Now neither of the two are willing to affirm Feeneyite EENS with a Vatican Council II interpreted without the false premise.

Sanborn and Fastiggi's interpretation of Vatican Council II is now obsolete. -Lionel Andrades