Bishop Robert Barron interprets Lumen Gentium 16 assuming it refers to personally known, physically visible non Catholics saved outside the Church. Why should I accept this irrationality which creates a rupture with the past Magisterium? Why should I be dishonest ?

 

Bishop Robert Barron interprets Lumen Gentium 16 assuming it  refers to personally known, physically visible non Catholics saved outside the Church. Why should I accept this irrationality which creates a rupture with the past Magisterium? Why should I be dishonest ?

We do not have to reject the Council but interpret it without the false premise. The Council would then be missionary again. There would no more be a doctrinal rupture with the past Magisterium. -Lionel Andrades