Monday, April 26, 2021

Catholics are not obliged to follow the interpretation of the National Cathechetical Centers all over the world in their interpretation of Vatican Council II since they use a false premise

 Catholics are not obliged to follow the interpretation of the National Cathechetical Centers all over the world in their interpretation of Vatican Council II  since they use a false premise. It is the same with Pope Francis and the National Catechetical Center, Italy.They can choose to interpret Vatican Council II with the rational premise, inference and conclusion.This would be Magisterial and Catholics could follow him. There would also be no rupture with the past Magisterium of the Catholic Church. - Lionel Andrades


 APRIL 19, 2021

The National Catechetical Office, Italy interprets Vatican Council II with a false premise, a false inference and a non traditional conclusion.This cannot be Magisterial.How could the Holy Spirit make such an objective mistake and not choose the rational option?

APRIL 14, 2021

Pope Francis and Pope Benedict are not magisterial on Vatican Council II since they interpret the Council with the false premise, inference and conclusion instead of the rational option. They are also not magisterial on the Nicene and Apostles Creed since they make the same mistake which can be avoided

https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2021/04/pope-francis-and-pope-benedict-are-not_14.html

___________________________________________


The National Catechetical Office, Italy is interprets Vatican Council II with a false premise, a false inference and a non traditional conclusion.This cannot be Magisterial.How could the Holy Spirit make such an objective mistake and not choose the rational option?

This is a human error.

The Catechetical Office, which Pope Francis visited in February this year, is in a rupture with the past Magisterium.So it  schismatic.The schism is created with a false premise.

Catholics in Italy are not obliged to follow a non magisterial interpretation of Vatican Council II, with a false premise instead of a rational option. -Lionel Andrades 

Fake premise

Lumen Gentium 8,Lumen Gentium 14, Lumen Gentium 16 etc in Vatican Council II refer to physically visible cases in 1965-2021.

Fake inference
They are objective examples of salvation outside the Church.

Fake conclusion
Vatican Council II contradicts the strict interpretation of the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus (EENS).The Athanasius Creed(outside the Church there is no salvation) and the Syllabus of Errors of Pope Pius IX ( ecumenism of return) were made obsolete.

Here is my interpretation of Vatican Council II in blue.

Rational Premise
LG 8, LG 14, LG 16 etc in Vatican Council II refer to physically invisible cases in 1965-2021.They are only hypothetical and theoretical. They exist only in our mind and are not solid bodies at Newton's level of time, space and matter.

Rational Inference
They are not objective examples of salvation outside the Church for us human beings.

Rational Conclusion
Vatican Council II does not contradict EENS as it was interpreted by the Jesuits in the Middle Ages.It does not contradict the strict interpretation of EENS of St. Thomas Aquinas( saved in invincible ignorance is invisible), St. Augustine and Fr. Leonard Feeney of Boston.

The Letter of the Holy Office(Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith) 1949 made an objective mistake.-Lionel Andrades


FEBRUARY 3, 2021



Pope Francis has called for interpreting Vatican Council II with a false premise and inference to create an artificial rupture with Tradition and the traditional teaching on their being exclusive salvation in the Catholic Church : this is unethical.Even the secular and Church- judges in Italy are following this error.

https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2021/02/pope-francis-has-called-for.html

JANUARY 15, 2021

In the moto proprio Spiritus Domini of Pope Francis, Vatican Council II is cited, interpreted with the false premise and inference and so there is a fake rupture with Tradition. No one has pointed out this error

 https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2021/01/in-moto-proprio-spiritus-domini-of-pope.html

JANUARY 15, 2021

The 55 year old liberal-traditionalist division is finished since now we can affirm Vatican Council II and Tradition, without the false premise. This was not possible for Archbishop Marcel Lefebvre.: The liberals cited Vatican Council II in papal documents like Spiritus Domini, to justify a break with Traditionhttps://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2021/01/the-55-year-old-liberal-traditionalist.html

 JANUARY 15, 2021

Pope Francis and the Italian government are promoting a Cushingite version of Vatican Council II so they cannot support Feeneyite extra ecclesiam nulla salus. With a false premise exceptions are created for the past ecclesiocentrism of the Catholic Church

https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2021/01/pope-francis-and-italian-government-are.html

______________________

 APRIL 14, 2021


Pope Francis and Pope Benedict are not magisterial on Vatican Council II since they interpret the Council with the false premise, inference and conclusion instead of the rational option
https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2021/04/pope-francis-and-pope-benedict-are-not.html


APRIL 15, 2021


Pope Francis and Pope Benedict's interpretation of the Catechism of the Catholic Church ( CCC 846, 1257) are non magisterial since they use a false premise to interpret CCC 846 (Outside the Church No Salvation) and CCC 1257 ( The Necessity of Baptism ).They have a rational and traditional choice which they avoid
https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2021/04/pope-francis-and-pope-benedicts.html

 APRIL 15, 2021

Pope Francis keeps mentioning Vatican Council II but it's the non magisterial version of the Council

https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2021/04/pope-francis-keeps-mentioning-vatican.html

 APRIL 11, 2021

Fr. Leonard Feeney, Archbishop Marcel Lefebvre and Archbishop Pierre Thuc did not know that Vatican Council II could be interpreted without the false premise, inference and conclusion

https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2021/04/for-fr-leonard-feeney-and-archbishop.html

APRIL 13, 2021

Cardinal Luiz Ladaria sj, Prefect of the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith, Vatican is not magisterial on Vatican Council II since he interprets the Council with the false premise, inference and conclusion instead of the rational and traditional option, in harmony with the past Magisterium of the Catholic Church.

https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2021/04/cardinal-luiz-ladaria-sj-prefect-of_13.html

APRIL 12, 2021



Repost : 'The red is not an exception to the blue' : new extraordinary understanding of Vatican Council II

https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2021/04/repost-red-is-not-exception-to-blue-new.html



  •   

    _________________________________________



        
    ___________________________________________


       
      
     With this rational model, the  Vatican  would not be contradicting the Athanasius Creed.

    ATHANASIUS CREED

    Image result for Athanasius Creed pHOTO

    'Whosoever will be saved, before all things it is necessary that he hold the catholic faith. Which faith unless every one do keep whole and undefiled, without doubt he shall perish everlastingly...'
    With this rational model they  would also not be contradicting the Syllabus of Errors of Pope Pius IX. 
     
    Image result for Syllabus of Errors of pOpe pius IX

    III. INDIFFERENTISM, LATITUDINARIANISM
    15. Every man is free to embrace and profess that religion which, guided by the light of reason, he shall consider true. — Allocution “Maxima quidem,” June 9, 1862; Damnatio “Multiplices inter,” June 10, 1851.
    16. Man may, in the observance of any religion whatever, find the way of eternal salvation, and arrive at eternal salvation. — Encyclical “Qui pluribus,” Nov. 9, 1846.
    17. Good hope at least is to be entertained of the eternal salvation of all those who are not at all in the true Church of Christ. — Encyclical “Quanto conficiamur,” Aug. 10, 1863, etc.
    18. Protestantism is nothing more than another form of the same true Christian religion, in which form it is given to please God equally as in the Catholic Church. — Encyclical “Noscitis,” Dec. 8, 1849.
    Now Vatican Council II interpreted with his  irrational premise, inference and conclusion contradicts the Syllabus of Errors of Pope Pius IX. 
    With the rational model, Vatican Council II would not contradict the Catechism of Pope Pius X.
    -Lionel Andrades

    1

    JANUARY 3, 2020

    Italy: Catholic Think Tank Pushes Radical Vision for Church




JUNE 28, 2018

Reposts : Catechetical programs of the USCCB in Boston, Worcester, Manchester are using a false premise

APRIL 16, 2014

Catechetical programs of the USCCB in Boston, Worcester, Manchester are using a false premise

Since the USCCB assumes that being saved in invincible ignorance and the baptism of desire are exceptions to all needing to enter the Catholic Church for salvation (See Fr.Peter C.Phan Notification of the USCCB), for them,the dead-saved with the baptism of desire etc  are visible exceptions to extra ecclesiam nulla salus.So the Diocese of Worcester, Manchester and Boston  in the USA repeat this objective error; of being able to see the dead,  in its catechetical programs.
Students who have studied at schools of the Slaves of the Immaculate Heart of Mary who can interpret magisterial documents in agreement with extra ecclesiam nulla salus, would find at parish catechism programs, that they are being taught that the Catechism (1993)contradicts itself. They are also taught to use an irrational interpretation of Vatican Council II. So the Council is a break with the dogma on salvation and the Catechism of Pope Pius X.
In the Diocese of Worcester where the St.Benedict Centers, the communities of Fr.Leonard Feeney, have canonical status, the Catechetical courses for laypeople, take it for granted  that CCC 846 is contradicted by CCC 847 and 848. The Catechism (CCC 846) says all need to enter the Church as through  a door and the Catechism also says all do not need to enter the Church (CCC 847,) since there are (known) exceptions saved in invincible ignorance etc.
The Called to Discipleship Course is available for Catholics and is intended for
  • Catechists in parishes and Catholic schools
  • Youth Ministers
  • Lectors
  • Eucharistic Ministers
  • RCIA Team Members
  • Anyone in parish ministry
  • Parishioners interested in enrichment (1)
For all of them (above) the Catechism is interpreted irrationally and so also Vatican Council II.
All salvation referred to in Vatican Council II i.e being saved with the seeds of the Word (AG 11), invincible ignorance (LG 16), imperfect communion with the Church (UR 3), good and holy things in other religions (NA 2) can be interpreted with COLUMN A or COLUMN B
COLUMN A
Implicit or us.
hypothetical for us.
invisible.
dejure (in principle).
subjective.

COLUMN B
explicit for us.
known in reality.
visible in the flesh.
defacto (in fact).
objective.
If COLUMN B is chosen then Vatican Council II contradicts the dogmaextra ecclesiam nulla salus, the Syllabus of Errors and Tradition.There are known exceptions. The dead-saved are visible. This is an irrational and common interpretation of Vatican Council II, it  is the one used Worcester,Manchester and Boston and is recommended by the USCCB.
If COLUMN A is chosen in the interpretation then Vatican Council II does not contradict the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus and Tradition.The Catholic Church's teaching on other religions and Christians communities and churches is the same before and after Vatican Council II.This is not taught in the Call to Discipleship Courses.
So there can be two interpretations of magisterial documents one rational and the other irrational and the dioceses are choosing the irrational one.


The University of Notre Dame’s Satellite Theological Education Program (STEP) (2)has partnered with the Diocese of Manchester to create an online version of the Called to Discipleship Core Course(2)They use a false premise in the interpretation of magisterial documents.
An Example of the False Premise and the Conclusion in Boston, Worcester and Manchester.

Seeds of the Word (Ad Gentes 7, Vatican Council II)

With the False Premise:
We can see non Catholics who have received salvation in 2014 with 'seeds of the Word'.
Conclusion: Vatican Council II contradicts extra ecclesiam nulla salus.
Vatican Council II contradicts itself. AG 7 - 'all' need 'faith and baptism' for salvation contradicts AG 11- being saved with 'seeds of the Word'.
This is taught at the University of Notre Dame's STEP  and by the Paulist Fathers' evangelisation in the Diocese of Manchester.
Without the False Premise.
Being saved with seeds of the Word is a possibility.
A possibility is not a known reality in a specific case in the present times, for us. A possibility is not an exception.
Seeds of the Word is not an exception.
Since it is not visible and known in a specific case in 2014 it is not relevant or an exception to extra ecclesiam nulla salus.
Conclusion: Vatican Council II does not contradict the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus.
This is not taught in USCCB approved Catholic Catechism.
Similarly in the interpretation of the Letter of the Holy Office 1949 to the Archbishop of Boston, Redemptoris Missio, Dominus Iesus etc the USCCB, Boston, Manchester and Worcester will use the False Premise and Column B in the interpretation.
-Lionel Andrades
1.
2.
_________________

WEDNESDAY, APRIL 16, 2014

Catechetical programs of the USCCB in Boston, Worcester, Manchester are using a false premise

 
Since the USCCB assumes that being saved in invincible ignorance and the baptism of desire are exceptions to all needing to enter the Catholic Church for salvation (See Fr.Pter C.Phan Notification of the USCCB), for them,the dead-saved with the baptism of desire etc  are visible exceptions to extra ecclesiam nulla salus.So the Diocese of Worcester, Manchester and Boston  in the USA repeat this objective error; of being able to see the dead,  in its catechetical programs.
Students who have studied at schools of the Slaves of the Immaculate Heart of Mary who can interpret magisterial documents in agreement with extra ecclesiam nulla salus, would find at parish catechism programs, that they are being taught that the Catechism (1993)contradicts itself. They are also taught to use an irrational interpretation of Vatican Council II. So the Council is a break with the dogma on salvation and the Catechism of Pope Pius X.
In the Diocese of Worcester where the St.Benedict Centers, the communities of Fr.Leonard Feeney, have canonical status, the Catechetical courses for laypeople, take it for granted  that CCC 846 is contradicted by CCC 847 and 848. The Catechism (CCC 846) says all need to enter the Church as through  a door and the Catechism also says all do not need to enter the Church (CCC 847,) since there are (known) exceptions saved in invincible ignorance etc.
The Called to Discipleship Course is available for Catholics and is intended for
  • Catechists in parishes and Catholic schools
  • Youth Ministers
  • Lectors
  • Eucharistic Ministers
  • RCIA Team Members
  • Anyone in parish ministry
  • Parishioners interested in enrichment (1)
For all of them (above) the Catechism is interpreted irrationally and so also Vatican Council II.
 
All salvation referred to in Vatican Council II i.e being saved with the seeds of the Word (AG 11), invincible ignorance (LG 16), imperfect communion with the Church (UR 3), good and holy things in other religions (NA 2) can be interpreted with COLUMN A or COLUMN B
COLUMN A
Implicit or us.
hypothetical for us.
invisible.
dejure (in principle).
subjective.
COLUMN B
explicit for us.
known in reality.
visible in the flesh.
defacto (in fact).
objective.
If COLUMN B is chosen then Vatican Council II contradicts the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus, the Syllabus of Errors and Tradition.There are known exceptions. The dead-saved are visible. This is an irrational and common interpretation of Vatican Council II, it  is the one used Worcester,Manchester and Boston and is recommended by the USCCB.
If COLUMN A is chosen in the interpretation then Vatican Council II does not contradict the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus and Tradition.The Catholic Church's teaching on other religions and Christians communities and churches is the same before and after Vatican Council II.This is not taught in the Call to Discipleship Courses.
 
So there can be two interpretations of magisterial documents one rational and the other irrational and the dioceses are choosing the irrational one.

The University of Notre Dame’s Satellite Theological Education Program (STEP) (2)has partnered with the Diocese of Manchester to create an online version of the Called to Discipleship Core Course (2)They use a false premise in the interpretation of magisterial documents.
An Example of the False Premise and the Conclusion in Boston, Worcester and Manchester.

Seeds of the Word (Ad Gentes 7, Vatican Council II)

With the False Premise:
We can see non Catholics who have received salvation in 2014 with 'seeds of the Word'.
Conclusion: Vatican Council II contradicts extra ecclesiam nulla salus.
Vatican Council II contradicts itself. AG 7 - 'all' need 'faith and baptism' for salvation contradicts AG 11- being saved with 'seeds of the Word'.
This is taught at the University of Notre Dame's STEP  and by the Paulist Fathers' evangelisation in the Diocese of Manchester.
Without the False Premise.
Being saved with seeds of the Word is a possibility.
A possibility is not a known reality in a specific case in the present times, for us. A possibility is not an exception.
Seeds of the Word is not an exception.
Since it is not visible and known in a specific case in 2014 it is not relevant or an exception to extra ecclesiam nulla salus.
Conclusion: Vatican Council II does not contradict the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus.
This is not taught in USCCB approved Catholic Catechism.
 
Similarly in the interpretation of the Letter of the Holy Office 1949 to the Archbishop of Boston, Redemptoris Missio, Dominus Iesus etc the USCCB, Boston, Manchester and Worcester will use the False Premise and Column B in the interpretation.
-Lionel Andrades
 
1.
 
2.

MONDAY, APRIL 26, 2021

Catholics are not obliged to follow the interpretation of the National Cathechetical Centers all over the world in their interpretation of Vatican Council II since they use a false premise

 Catholics are not obliged to follow the interpretation of the National Cathechetical Centers all over the world in their interpretation of Vatican Council II  since they use a false premise. It is the same with Pope Francis and the National Catechetical Center, Italy.They can choose to interpret Vatican Council II with the rational premise, inference and conclusion.This would be Magisterial and Catholics could follow him. There would also be no rupture with the past Magisterium of the Catholic Church. - Lionel Andrades



 

 JULY 10, 2017

On the 10th Anniversary of Summorum Pontificum: We thank in particular...- New Catholic, Rorate Caeili (blind leading the blind)

On the 10th Anniversary of Summorum Pontificum: We thank in particular...


from Rorate Caeili
IN PRIMIS... Pope Benedict XVI, Cardinal Castrillon Hoyos, Archbishop Marcel Lefebvre, Bishop Castro Mayer: long may their memories live!

The beautiful words of that great French hero of the Traditional Mass, Jean Madiran (1920-2013: Rest in peace!), who lived to see the miracle, remembering the names of some who died in the battlefield:




"For thirty seven years, a whole generation of militant Catholics, religious or lay members of the Militant Church (a generation reaching from 7 to 97 years of age) suffered, without giving in, openly defying the arbitrary interdict on the Traditional Mass. We think of our dead: Cardinal Ottaviani, Father Calmel, Father Raymond Dulac, Monsignor Renato Pozzi, Monsignor Lefebvre, Father Guérard. And, among the laymen: Cristina Campo, Luce Quenette, Louis Salleron, Eric de Saventhem. The pontifical goodwill is for them as a light breeze, which sweetly brings peace to their tombs. Wherever they are now, they do not need it anymore. But it is their memory amongst us which is appeased and elevated."

And also: Father GamberMichael DaviesTito Casini, and so many, many others (priests, laymen and laywomen- God knows their names!), each of whom placed his own brick, large or small, in the great dam built for decades against the tumultuous tides of the late twentieth century. Thank you, thank you, thank you dearly! The heat of the battle has caused so much personal attrition, exaggerations, and misunderstandings... Yet, justice cannot be denied: gratitude is owed to those who did not live to see, on this earth, the glorious date of July 7, 2007.

https://rorate-caeli.blogspot.com/2017/07/on-10th-anniversary-of-summorum_7.html#more



JUNE 11, 2017

There could also have been a Vatican Council II Feeneyite in 1965 if Fr. Nicholas Gruner and Chris Ferrara knew about it.They did not. Neither did Abp. Lefebvre.

http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2017/06/there-could-also-have-been-vatican.html


JUNE 5, 2017

When Chris Ferrara wrote The Great Facade he did not know Vatican Council II could be interpreted without the irrational premise and the conclusion would be different

http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2017/06/when-chris-ferrara-wrote-great-facade.html


FEBRUARY 16, 2014

MICHAEL DAVIS MADE A MISTAKE ON THE ISSUE OF VATICAN COUNCIL II AND OTHER RELIGIONS : ALSO ON RELIGIOUS LIBERTY ?
http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2014/02/michael-davis-made-mistake-on-issue-of.html

Did Archbishop Marcel Lefebvre know that implicit desire,invincible ignorance etc were not known to us and irrelevant to the dogma?

JULY 31, 2016

Archbishop Lefebvre's Letter to Confused Catholics indicates he did not know of an alternative interpretation of Vatican Council II which had the hermeneutic of continuity and no ambiguity

http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2016/07/archbishop-lefebvres-letter-to-confused.html


Pope Pius XII, Cardinals Ottaviani, Cardinal Francesco Marchetti Selvaggiani and Archbishop Marcel Lefebvre were factually wrong

http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2016/01/pope-pius-xii-cardinals.html
Archbishop Marcel Lefebvre, Michael Davies, Dietrich Von Hildebrand and other traditionalists allowed the Church to continue on a wrong theological way http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2015/07/archbishop-marcel-lefebvre-michael.html

This group of traditionalists instead of correcting the factual error of 1949 consolidated it and did not expose it  http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2015/07/this-group-of-traditionalists-instead.html

Michael Davis, Romano Amerio, Dietrich von Hildebrand were not aware of the irrational premise : Michael Mat, Chris Ferrara, John Rao, James Bogle, Joseph Shaw agree? http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2014/10/michael-davis-romano-amerio-dietrich_11.html

No response from David Domet, Louie Verrecchio and Boniface when I say that they can interpret Vatican Council II with invisible for us LG 16, LG 14 etc being just invisible.That's all  http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2016/07/no-response-from-david-domet-louie.html

VATICAN COUNCIL II IS NON NEGOTIABLE AND IN HARMONY WITH EENS: WE DON'T BOW BEFORE THE LEFEBVRIST OR LEFTIST ERROR http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2016/08/vatican-council-ii-is-non-negotiable.html

Prominent lay supporter of the SSPX still does not want to be quoted : Can you see people in Heaven?  http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2016/08/prominent-lay-supporter-of-sspx-still.html


Too many people are agreeing with me.They understand Archbishop Marcel Lefebvre made a doctrinal and objective mistake. He contradicted common sense and the Principle of Non Contradiction

http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2016/08/too-many-people-are-agreeing-with.html

__________________________________________________________

JUNE 30, 2017
Tridentine Rite Mass in Rome is a sacrilege : needs to be challenged canonically
http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2017/06/tridentine-rite-mass-in-rome-is.html
JULY 9, 2017
It is a week and no FSSP priest denies what I have written : TLM with manifest mortal sin for politically correct reasons
http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2017/07/it-is-week-and-no-fssp-priest-denies.html
JULY 3, 2017
Laity could ask the bishop to provide them with FSSP priests who do not make irrational inferences and change the meaning of the Nicene Creed
http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2017/07/laity-could-ask-bishop-to-provide-them.html
JULY 3, 2017
FSSP church Santissima Trinita dei Pelligrini : new understanding of Nicene Creed
http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2017/07/fssp-church-santissima-trinita-dei.html
JULY 10, 2017
Fort Worth, Texas Latin Mass community should appeal to the Marriage Tribunal
http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2017/07/fort-worth-texas-latin-mass-community.html
JULY 9, 2017
Marriage in Extraordinary or Ordinary form of the Mass in Italy or Germany is being solemnised in mortal sin otherwise no permission would be given by the local bishop
http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2017/07/marriage-in-extraordinary-or-ordinary.html
JULY 9, 2017
Engaged- to- be- maried couples should canonically challenge the German bishops and priests to accept Vatican Council ( Feeneyite) in harmony with EENS (Feeneyite)
http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2017/07/engaged-to-be-maried-couples-should.html
JULY 8, 2017
Deacon Edward Schaefer unable to say that all Catholics should proclaim that all Jews, Muslims and other non Catholics, with no exceptions in 2017, are oriented to the fires of Hell and this is a magisterial teaching according to Vatican Council II(AG 7, LG 14)
http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2017/07/deacon-edward-schaefer-unable-to-say.html
JULY 8, 2017
All Catholics should proclaim that all Jews, Muslims and other non Catholics, with no exceptions in 2017, are oriented to the fires of Hell and this is a magisterial teaching according to Vatican Council II(AG 7, LG 14)
http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2017/07/all-catholics-should-proclaim-that-all.html
JULY 6, 2017
Everything hinges on visible baptism of desire : correct the premise and change the Council http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2017/07/everything-hinges-on-visible-baptism-of.html
JULY 5, 2017
That the baptism of desire is invisible and not physically visible is a great secret of Cardinal Ladaria and others at the Vatican.For them this is very important information to hide http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2017/07/that-baptism-of-desire-is-invisible-and.html
JULY 5, 2017
To accomodate the error of visible baptism of desire Cardinal Ratzinger changed the Profession of Faith, Oath of Fidelity and Canon Law
http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2017/07/to-accomodate-error-of-visible-baptism.html

JULY 5, 2017
We can renew our consecration to the Immaculate Heart and also affirm Feeneyite theology and reject the Cushingite one : then see the dramatic difference in Vatican Council II http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2017/07/we-can-renew-our-consecration-to.html
JULY 5, 2017
SSPX must ask Bishops Conferences in the USA, UK, Italy, etc to affirm Vatican Council II( Feeneyite) or not make the Council an issue for reconciliation
http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2017/07/sspx-must-ask-bishops-conferences-in_5.html
JULY 4, 2017
CDF asks SSPX to interpret Vatican Council II with irrational Cushingism and reject traditional Feeneyism
http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2017/07/cdf-wants-sspx-to-interpret-vatican.html
JULY 4, 2017
FSSP priests need to interpret the Nicene Creed with Feeneyism instead of Cushingism.Bishops must be informed about the error
http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2017/07/fssp-priests-need-to-interpret-nicene.html
JULY 3, 2017
The bottom line is that we are all reciting the Nicene Creed but there are two different interpretations
http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2017/07/the-bottom-line-is-that-we-are-all.html
 JUNE 30, 2017
No priest in Rome will give his telephone number
http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2017/06/no-priest-in-rome-will-give-his_30.html
JUNE 29, 2017
Pamphlet problems : no priest available
http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2017/06/pamphlet-problems-no-priest-available.html
JUNE 27, 2017
No contradiction or clarification from Fr.Gleize : SSPX in a crisis too
http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2017/06/no-contradiction-or-clarification-from.html
JUNE 26, 2017
Doctrinal talks were conducted with Fr.Gleize on 'the other side'
http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2017/06/doctrinal-talks-were-conducted-with.html
JUNE 26, 2017
Pope Benedict permitted Fr. Jean Marie Gleize to lead in doctrinal talks since he was a liberal ?
http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2017/06/pope-benedict-permitted-fr-jean-marie.html
JUNE 25, 2017
Mons. Brunero Gherardini misled the Slaves of the Immaculate Heart of Mary and many traditionalists
http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2017/06/mons-brunero-gherardini-misled-slaves.html
JUNE 24, 2017
Official statement from SSPX awaited : Fr.Gleize and other theologians have got it wrong
http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2017/06/frjean-marie-gleize-needs-to-change-his.html

JUNE 20, 2017
Latin Mass community can canonically challenge catechetical instruction
http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2017/06/latin-mass-community-can-canonically.html
JUNE 15, 2017
All Board Members of the Collegium Sanctorum Angelorum will have to accept the New Theology at the Latin Mass
http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2017/06/all-board-members-of-collegium.html
JULY 2, 2017
Cardinal Luiz Ladaria S.j made factual errors in two ITC theological papers which were politically correct
http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2017/07/cardinal-luiz-ladaria-sj-made-factual.html

____________________________________________

DECEMBER 7, 2016
Ecclesia Dei has approved the Tridentine Rite Mass but only with the new ecclesiology in 2017 : Summorum Pontificum pilgrimage  http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2016/12/pontifical-commission-ecclesia-dei-has.html

MARCH 7, 2014

Summorum Pontificum : those who do not use an irrational premise in the interpretation of Vatican Council II are called reactionarieshttp://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2014/03/summorum-pontificum-those-who-do-not.html


MARCH 7, 2014

Summorum Pontificum does not say if Vatican Council II is to be interpreted with or without the false premise

http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2014/03/summorum-pontificum-does-not-say-if.html

 AUGUST 25, 2016


The Latin Mass is available in Rome but not the Tridentine Rite Mass.That has been effectivly prohibited by the contemporary magisterium and the political Left.It is not there even at the SSPX chapelhttp://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2016/08/the-latin-mass-is-available-in-rome-but.html

NOVEMBER 19, 2013

Ecclesiology is not dependent on the liturgyhttp://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2013/11/ecclesiology-is-not-dependent-on-liturgy.html


 DECEMBER 3, 2011

IMPEDIMENT FOR THOSE WHO OFFER THE TRADITIONAL LATIN MASS ?

http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2011/12/impediment-for-those-who-offer.html

____________________________________________________________

APRIL 19, 2017

Pope Benedict XVI could have interpreted Vatican Council II and the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus in March 2016 with Feeneyism instead of Cushingism: he chose heresy and the hermeneutic of rupturehttp://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2017/04/pope-benedict-xvi-could-have.html

_____________________

Lionel Andrades
Catholic lay man in Rome,
Writer on the discovery of the two interpretations of Vatican Council II, one is rational and the other is irrational, one is interpreted with the false premise and the other without it. One is Magisterial and the other, the common one, is non Magisterial.
It is the same for the Creeds and Catechisms.There can be two interpretations.
Why should Catholics choose an irrational version which is heretical, non traditional and schismatic, when a rational option is there which is traditional ?
Blog: Eucharist and Mission
Tel:- 

No comments: