The interpretation of Magisterial documents by the present two popes would be different from that of the popes before 1930,who did not use the false premise. The popes at that time were Feeneyites. Today they are Cushingites

 Jeff Mirus and Phil Lawler at Catholic Culture are leftists on Vatican Council II even though they may be conservative on other issues. They are forced, for whatever reason, to interpret the Council and the extra ecclesiam nulla salus with a fake premise.

So they would be doing the same with the Creeds and Catechisms and the result would be heretical and schismatic. They would say, like other Catholics, that they believe in the one, holy, Catholic and Apostolic Church but their interpretation of Magisterial documents would be different from mine.

Similarly the interpretation of Magisterial documents by the present two popes would be different from that of the popes before 1930,who did not use the false premise. The popes at that time were Feeneyites. Today they are Cushingites. - Lionel Andrades

 APRIL 9, 2021

It was not known to Archbishop Marcel Lefebvre and Fr. Leonard Feeney : Vatican Council II is in harmony with 16th century EENS. There is no ' development of doctrine'.

https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2021/04/it-was-not-known-to-archbishop-marcel.html