Elections for the Mayor's office in Rome is to be held and there is no Catholic candidate.The center right candidates also interpret Vatican Council II with the false premise, the red passages.
The center right candidates are not Catholic and so like the Left they use the red passages to interpret Vatican Council II and the Creeds and Catechisms.
The center right's theology is still secular-left like that of Pope Benedict.Europe's center right political parties need to unite and get the Catholic Church,to appeal to the Church.They need to get the ecclesiastics on their side. The Church presently supports the Left while it claims there is a separation of Church and State. Instead there must must be a separation of the Leftist state and the Church.
So they need to oppose the secular-left on religious issues.
1. They could oppose the Chief Minister and Bishop Lorenzo Loppa on the issue of the Trisulti Monastery.
2.They need to oppose the Italian government handing out funds to those who interpret Vatican Council II with a false premise. This is deception.
3.They would oppose the pontifical universities forcing students/seminarians, to interpret Vatican Council II with the red passages, to get admission. They would demand academic freedom.
4.They would oppose the policy which only permits vocations to the religious life, men and women, for only those who use the leftis approved New Theology, created with the red passages.
5.They would oppose Catechetical activity in the parishes and dioceses, based upon leftist theology, created with the red passages, approved by those who are not Catholics, officially and in public.
6. They must oppose the pontifical and secular university libraries which display books on Vatican Council II interpreted with a false premise, inference and conclusion.
7.They could oppose Cardinal Marcelo Semeraro's books on Ecclesiology being disseminated. He supports Cushingite theology so there is a false rupture with the past ecclesiology of the Catholic Church. There is a rupture with the traditional ecclesiology of the Catholic Church supported by the center left.
8.They could oppose professors at the La Sapienza university who approve leftist ideology and still claim they are Catholics and who refuse to use the blue passages instead of the irrational red passages.-Lionel Andrades
BAPTISM OF DESIRE, BAPTISM OF BLOOD AND INVINCIBLE IGNORANCE
Fake premise
The Baptism of Desire, Baptism of Blood and Invincible Ignorance refer to physically visible cases in 1949-2021.
Fake inference
They are objective examples of salvation outside the Church.They are examples of known non Catholics saved without Catholic faith and the baptism of water.
Fake conclusion
So they contradict the strict interpretation of the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus (EENS).The Athanasius Creed(outside the Church there is no salvation) and the Syllabus of Errors of Pope Pius IX ( ecumenism of return) were made obsolete.
Pope Pius XII and the Holy Office(CDF) made an objective mistake.
BAPTISM OF DESIRE, BAPTISM OF BLOOD AND INVINCIBLE IGNORANCE
Rational Premise
The Baptism of Desire, Baptism of Blood and Invincible Ignorance refer to physically invisible cases in 1949-2021
They are only hypothetical and theoretical. They exist only in our mind and are not solid bodies at Newton's level of time, space and matter.
Rational Inference
They are not objective examples of salvation outside the Church for us human beings.They are not examples of known non Catholics saved without Catholic faith and the baptism of water.
Rational Conclusion
They do not contradict EENS as it was interpreted by the Jesuits in the Middle Ages.They do not contradict the strict interpretation of EENS of St. Thomas Aquinas( saved in invincible ignorance is invisible), St. Augustine and Fr. Leonard Feeney of Boston.
The Letter of the Holy Office(Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith) 1949 made an objective mistake.
__________
VATICAN COUNCIL II
Fake premise
Unitatis Redintigratio 3, Lumen Gentium 14(Baptism of Desire), Lumen Gentium 16 (Invincible ignorance) etc in Vatican Council II refer to physically visible cases in 1965-2021.
Fake inference
They are objective examples of salvation outside the Church.
Fake conclusion
Vatican Council II contradicts the strict interpretation of the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus (EENS).The Athanasius Creed(outside the Church there is no salvation) and the Syllabus of Errors of Pope Pius IX ( ecumenism of return) were made obsolete.
Pope Paul VI and the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith, Vatican, made an objective error.
VATICAN COUNCIL II
Rational Premise
Unitatis Redintigratio 3, Lumen Gentium 14 and Lumen Gentium 16 in Vatican Council II refer to physically invisible cases in 1965-2021.They are only hypothetical and theoretical. They exist only in our mind and are not solid bodies at Newton's level of time, space and matter.
Rational Inference
They are not objective examples of salvation outside the Church for us human beings.
Rational Conclusion
Vatican Council II does not contradict EENS as it was interpreted by the Jesuits in the Middle Ages.It does not contradict the strict interpretation of EENS of St. Thomas Aquinas( saved in invincible ignorance is invisible), St. Augustine and Fr. Leonard Feeney of Boston.
The Letter of the Holy Office(Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith) 1949 made an objective mistake.-L.A
______________________________________
Lionel Andrades
Catholic lay man in Rome,
Writer on the discovery of the two interpretations of Vatican Council II, one is rational and the other is irrational, one is interpreted with the false premise and the other without it. One is Magisterial and the other, the common one, is non Magisterial.
It is the same for the Creeds and Catechisms.There can be two interpretations.
Why should Catholics choose an irrational version which is heretical, non traditional and schismatic, when a rational option is there which is traditional ?
Blog: Eucharist and Mission
Tel:-
Posts
No comments:
Post a Comment