Fr.Mark Goring is Scriptural on salvation but allows Vatican Council II interpreted with the false premise, the red passages, to contradict Scripture - and he does not like it. He does not like in Bishop Barron.
Bishop Barron would also be Scriptural but interprets Vatican Council II with the false premise, the red passages, and then assumes hypothetical cases are objective examples of salvation outside the Catholic Church. So Lumen Gentium 16 would contradict the Great Commission.There would be alleged practical exceptions, as if it is possible. Similarly LG 16 would project exceptions for John 3:5 and Mark 16:16,
So Bishop Barron is going ahead and quoting LG 16 as an exception to exclusive ecclesiocentrism in the Catholic Church and Fr. Mark Goring and the present two popes are doing the same. They are using the New Theology which is based upon the red passages, the confusing of what is invisible as being visible.
Fr. Mark Goring has to interpret Vatican Council II with the blue passages and then there is no rupture with his Scriptural quotations. He could then correct Bishop Robert Barron when he cites Vatican Council II, interpreted irrationally, to create a new doctrine in the Catholic Church. -Lionel Andrades
BAPTISM OF DESIRE, BAPTISM OF BLOOD AND INVINCIBLE IGNORANCE
Fake premise
The Baptism of Desire, Baptism of Blood and Invincible Ignorance refer to physically visible cases in 1949-2021.
Fake inference
They are objective examples of salvation outside the Church.They are examples of known non Catholics saved without Catholic faith and the baptism of water.
Fake conclusion
So they contradict the strict interpretation of the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus (EENS).The Athanasius Creed(outside the Church there is no salvation) and the Syllabus of Errors of Pope Pius IX ( ecumenism of return) were made obsolete.
Pope Pius XII and the Holy Office(CDF) made an objective mistake.
BAPTISM OF DESIRE, BAPTISM OF BLOOD AND INVINCIBLE IGNORANCE
Rational Premise
The Baptism of Desire, Baptism of Blood and Invincible Ignorance refer to physically invisible cases in 1949-2021
They are only hypothetical and theoretical. They exist only in our mind and are not solid bodies at Newton's level of time, space and matter.
Rational Inference
They are not objective examples of salvation outside the Church for us human beings.They are not examples of known non Catholics saved without Catholic faith and the baptism of water.
Rational Conclusion
They do not contradict EENS as it was interpreted by the Jesuits in the Middle Ages.They do not contradict the strict interpretation of EENS of St. Thomas Aquinas( saved in invincible ignorance is invisible), St. Augustine and Fr. Leonard Feeney of Boston.
The Letter of the Holy Office(Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith) 1949 made an objective mistake.
__________
VATICAN COUNCIL II
Fake premise
Unitatis Redintigratio 3, Lumen Gentium 14(Baptism of Desire), Lumen Gentium 16 (Invincible ignorance) etc in Vatican Council II refer to physically visible cases in 1965-2021.
Fake inference
They are objective examples of salvation outside the Church.
Fake conclusion
Vatican Council II contradicts the strict interpretation of the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus (EENS).The Athanasius Creed(outside the Church there is no salvation) and the Syllabus of Errors of Pope Pius IX ( ecumenism of return) were made obsolete.
Pope Paul VI and the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith, Vatican, made an objective error.
VATICAN COUNCIL II
Rational Premise
Unitatis Redintigratio 3, Lumen Gentium 14 and Lumen Gentium 16 in Vatican Council II refer to physically invisible cases in 1965-2021.They are only hypothetical and theoretical. They exist only in our mind and are not solid bodies at Newton's level of time, space and matter.
Rational Inference
They are not objective examples of salvation outside the Church for us human beings.
Rational Conclusion
Vatican Council II does not contradict EENS as it was interpreted by the Jesuits in the Middle Ages.It does not contradict the strict interpretation of EENS of St. Thomas Aquinas( saved in invincible ignorance is invisible), St. Augustine and Fr. Leonard Feeney of Boston.
The Letter of the Holy Office(Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith) 1949 made an objective mistake.-L.A
______________________________________
Lionel Andrades
Catholic lay man in Rome,
Writer on the discovery of the two interpretations of Vatican Council II, one is rational and the other is irrational, one is interpreted with the false premise and the other without it. One is Magisterial and the other, the common one, is non Magisterial.
It is the same for the Creeds and Catechisms.There can be two interpretations.
Why should Catholics choose an irrational version which is heretical, non traditional and schismatic, when a rational option is there which is traditional ?
Blog: Eucharist and Mission
E-mail: lionelandrades10@
Tel:-
____________
https://www.miur.gov.it/
MAY 1, 2021
The German Catholic Bishops Conference and the German Ministry of Education, needs to clarify that Vatican Council II can only interpreted with the blue and passages and not the red ones. Every one must choose the rational option only
https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2021/05/the-german-catholic-bishops-conference.html
MAY 1, 2021
Teachers of the Catholic religion, in public schools in Italy, use a false premise to interpret Vatican Council II and this is approved by the Italian Ministry of Education
https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2021/05/teachers-of-catholic-religion-in-public.html
MAY 1, 2021
An academic degree is being given by German theologians and the universities John Lateran and Regina Apostolorum, Rome to students who major in the writings of Pope Benedict, all interpreted with the false premise, inference and conclusion; the irrational red passages. This project is uethical and needs to be closed down. It is not Catholic
https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2021/05/an-academic-degree-is-being-given-by.html
Posts
No comments:
Post a Comment