How can we have two popes who do not interpret Vatican Council II without the false premise but instead teach the people to use a false premise to interpret Magisterial documents, and the cardinals and bishops are following them ? Even ambassadors of Hungary and Poland to the Holy See, use the false premise to interpret Vatican Council II.
How can they call this deception the 'deposit of the faith' and the 'magisterium' ? All the bishops conferences are following the error.
Ambassadors to the Holy See who were present at the March for Life event on Saturday are also following this theological error.-Lionel Andrades
MAY 24, 2021
So there really cannot be a new Synodality based upon 'the spirit of Vatican Council II' which needs to be propped with a fake premise.The spirit of Vatican Council II is traditional. The Synods need to acknowledge this
https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2021/05/so-there-really-cannot-be-new.html
MAY 24, 2021
So we are back to traditional Mission since Vatican Council II is traditional.The red is not an exception to the blue
https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2021/05/so-we-are-back-to-traditional-mission.html
MAY 24, 2021
Without the false premise used in the interpretation of Vatican Council II there is no 'spirit of Vatican Council II'. There is no liberalism.Since without the false premise the Council is traditional.
https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2021/05/without-false-premise-used-in.html
MAY 24, 2021
Pope Benedict sent a message to the Polish minor seminary and did not tell them that they should stop interpreting Vatican Council II, the Catechism of the Catholic Church(n.1257,845) and the Creeds and other Magisterial documents- with a fake premise, to create ' a hermeneutic of rupture' with Tradition
https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2021/05/pope-benedict-sent-message-to-polish.html
MAY 24, 2021
Cardinal Raymond Leo Burke is part of the same false Church as Pope Francis and Pope Benedict which use a fake premise to interpret Magisterial documents ( Creeds, Catechisms, EENS etc) to create a false rupture with Tradition and which they consider magisterial.They have a rational choice before them which is Magisterial
https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2021/05/cardinal-raymond-leo-burke-is-part-of.html
MAY 23, 2021
Pope Benedict could apologize for the theological mess he promoted in the Catholic Church : he did not caution the Polish minor seminary in a recent message
https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2021/05/pope-benedict-could-apologize-for.html
Fake premise
Lumen Gentium 8,Lumen Gentium 14, Lumen Gentium 16 etc in Vatican Council II refer to physically visible cases in 1965-2021.
Fake inference
They are objective examples of salvation outside the Church.
Fake conclusion
Vatican Council II contradicts the strict interpretation of the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus (EENS).The Athanasius Creed(outside the Church there is no salvation) and the Syllabus of Errors of Pope Pius IX ( ecumenism of return) were made obsolete.
Here is my interpretation of Vatican Council II in blue.
Rational Premise
LG 8, LG 14, LG 16 etc in Vatican Council II refer to physically invisible cases in 1965-2021.They are only hypothetical and theoretical. They exist only in our mind and are not solid bodies at Newton's level of time, space and matter.
Rational Inference
They are not objective examples of salvation outside the Church for us human beings.
Rational Conclusion
Vatican Council II does not contradict EENS as it was interpreted by the Jesuits in the Middle Ages.It does not contradict the strict interpretation of EENS of St. Thomas Aquinas( saved in invincible ignorance is invisible), St. Augustine and Fr. Leonard Feeney of Boston.
The Letter of the Holy Office(Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith) 1949 made an objective mistake.-Lionel Andrades
Lionel Andrades
Promoter of the Lionel Andrades interpretation of Vatican Council II.
Catholic lay man in Rome,
Writer on the discovery of the two interpretations of Vatican Council II, one is rational and the other is irrational, one is interpreted with the false premise and the other without it. One is Magisterial and the other, the common one, is non Magisterial.
It is the same for the Creeds and Catechisms.There can be two interpretations.
Why should Catholics choose an irrational version which is heretical, non traditional and schismatic, when a rational option is there which is traditional ?
Blog: Eucharist and Mission
E-mail: lionelandrades10@
____________________
Posts
No comments:
Post a Comment