Pope John Paul II, Cardinal Ratzinger and Archbishop Marcel Lefebvre did not correct Pope Paul VI when he interpreted Vatican Council II with a false premise, inference and conclusion.Instead Pope John Paul II and Cardinal Ratzinger excommunicated Archbishop Lefebvre.The fundamental issue was Vatican Council II.
Pope Benedict continues to repeat the mistake of Pope Paul VI and Pope John Paul II.He interprets Vatican Council II as a development of doctrine and a break with EENS of the missionaries of the 16th century.He has stated this in public. This indicates that he uses the false premise.He also interprets the Creeds and Catechisms with the same error.
If he used the rational premise, inference and conclusion he would have to affirm 16th century EENS and there would be no development of doctrine.
Pope John Paul II did not correct the mistake of Pope Paul VI and Cardinal Ratzinger. He also interpreted Vatican Council II with the false premise, inference and non traditional conclusion. -Lionel Andrades
Fake premise
Lumen Gentium 8,Lumen Gentium 14, Lumen Gentium 16 etc in Vatican Council II refer to physically visible cases in 1965-2021.
Fake inference
They are objective examples of salvation outside the Church.
Fake conclusion
Vatican Council II contradicts the strict interpretation of the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus (EENS).The Athanasius Creed(outside the Church there is no salvation) and the Syllabus of Errors of Pope Pius IX ( ecumenism of return) were made obsolete.
Here is my interpretation of Vatican Council II in blue.
Rational Premise
LG 8, LG 14, LG 16 etc in Vatican Council II refer to physically invisible cases in 1965-2021.They are only hypothetical and theoretical. They exist only in our mind and are not solid bodies at Newton's level of time, space and matter.
Rational Inference
They are not objective examples of salvation outside the Church for us human beings.
Rational Conclusion
Vatican Council II does not contradict EENS as it was interpreted by the Jesuits in the Middle Ages.It does not contradict the strict interpretation of EENS of St. Thomas Aquinas( saved in invincible ignorance is invisible), St. Augustine and Fr. Leonard Feeney of Boston.
The Letter of the Holy Office(Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith) 1949 made an objective mistake.-Lionel Andrades
Lionel Andrades
Promoter of the Lionel Andrades interpretation of Vatican Council II.
Catholic lay man in Rome,
Writer on the discovery of the two interpretations of Vatican Council II, one is rational and the other is irrational, one is interpreted with the false premise and the other without it. One is Magisterial and the other, the common one, is non Magisterial.
It is the same for the Creeds and Catechisms.There can be two interpretations.
Why should Catholics choose an irrational version which is heretical, non traditional and schismatic, when a rational option is there which is traditional ?
Blog: Eucharist and Mission
____________________
Posts
No comments:
Post a Comment