The professors at the Gregorian Pontifical University, Rome must not be allowed, to teach deception at the theology and philosophy departments : this is a secular and civil issue too. It is unethical.

 

Dario VITALI

Full Professor, Faculty of Theology

Direttore del Dipartimento di Teologia Dogmatica

The professors at the Gregorian Pontifical University, Rome must not be allowed, to teach deception at the theology and philosophy departments.Students must be informed when a professor, for political or personal reasons, interprets Vatican Council II, the Creeds, Catechisms etc, with a false premise and inference.This is unethical even in a secular sense.It comes under the ambit of the civil organisaton.

The false premise, instead of the rational one, is chosen and then the non traditional conclusion,is projected as a teaching of the Catholic Church. -Lionel Andrades

MAY 11, 2021

Rome Vicariate's deception at Lumsa University

 The  Rome Vicariate's theology program for lay Catholics is non Magisterial.It is political.They use a false premise to interpret Vatican Council II.So a false rupture is created with Catholic Tradition.Practical exceptions are put forward for the traditional teachings on exclusive salvation in the Catholic Church.

Hypothetical cases of LG 8, LG 14, LG 16, UR 3, NA 2, GS 22 etc are projected as examples of non Catholics saved outside the Church, without faith and baptism, in the present times 1965-2021.

There are no such cases.

But the speakers of the Vicariate's Ecclesia Mater program for lay people, remain politically correct with this lie.The course in theology is presented in a difficult language.The speakers have much to hide.

The courses are at the Lumsa University and some of the parishes. The program is deceptive and is based upon the irrational red passages and not the blue rational alternative.- Lionel Andrades

Teologia per Laici

http://www.ecclesiamater.org/CategoryPage.aspx?cat=13&doc=36

http://www.ecclesiamater.org/CategoryPage.aspx?cat=13

_____________________________________________

BAPTISM OF DESIRE, BAPTISM OF BLOOD AND INVINCIBLE IGNORANCE

Fake premise

The Baptism of Desire, Baptism of Blood and Invincible Ignorance refer to physically visible cases in 1949-2021.

Fake inference

They are objective examples of salvation outside the Church.They are examples of known non Catholics saved without Catholic faith and the baptism of water.

Fake conclusion

So they contradict the strict interpretation of the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus (EENS).The Athanasius Creed(outside the Church there is no salvation) and the Syllabus of Errors of Pope Pius IX ( ecumenism of return) were made obsolete.

Pope Pius XII and the Holy Office(CDF) made an objective mistake.

BAPTISM OF DESIRE, BAPTISM OF BLOOD AND INVINCIBLE IGNORANCE

Rational Premise

The Baptism of Desire, Baptism of Blood and Invincible Ignorance refer to physically invisible cases in 1949-2021

They are only hypothetical and theoretical. They exist only in our mind and are not solid bodies at Newton's level of time, space and matter.

Rational Inference

They are not objective examples of salvation outside the Church for us human beings.They are not examples of known non Catholics saved without Catholic faith and the baptism of water.

Rational Conclusion

They do not contradict EENS as it was interpreted by the Jesuits in the Middle Ages.They do not contradict the strict interpretation of EENS of St. Thomas Aquinas( saved in invincible ignorance is invisible), St. Augustine and Fr. Leonard Feeney of Boston.

The Letter of the Holy Office(Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith) 1949 made an objective mistake.

__________

VATICAN COUNCIL II

Fake premise

Unitatis Redintigratio 3, Lumen Gentium 14(Baptism of Desire), Lumen Gentium 16 (Invincible ignorance) etc in Vatican Council II refer to physically visible cases in 1965-2021.

Fake inference

They are objective examples of salvation outside the Church.

Fake conclusion

Vatican Council II contradicts the strict interpretation of the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus (EENS).The Athanasius Creed(outside the Church there is no salvation) and the Syllabus of Errors of Pope Pius IX ( ecumenism of return) were made obsolete.

Pope Paul VI and the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith, Vatican, made an objective error.

VATICAN COUNCIL II

Rational Premise

 Unitatis Redintigratio 3, Lumen Gentium  14 and Lumen Gentium 16  in Vatican Council II refer to physically invisible cases in 1965-2021.They are only hypothetical and theoretical. They exist only in our mind and are not solid bodies at Newton's level of time, space and matter.

Rational Inference

They are not objective examples of salvation outside the Church for us human beings.

Rational Conclusion

Vatican Council II does not contradict EENS as it was interpreted by the Jesuits in the Middle Ages.It does not contradict the strict interpretation of EENS of St. Thomas Aquinas( saved in invincible ignorance is invisible), St. Augustine and Fr. Leonard Feeney of Boston.

The Letter of the Holy Office(Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith) 1949 made an objective mistake.-L.A

_____________________

Lionel Andrades,

Catholic lay man in Rome, 

Writer on the two interpretations of Vatican Council II, the Creeds, Catechisms and extra ecclesiam nulla salus.One is rational and the other irrational, one has the false premise and the other is without it,

E-mail: lionelandrades10@gmail.com

blog: Eucharist and Mission

_______________________________