All the books on Vatican Council II in general written by pro-SSPX authors are written with a false premise and need to be phased out

All the books on Vatican Council II written by pro- SSPX authors, are written with a false premise. They need to be phased out.The books could have been written without the false premise and inference and then the conclusion would have been traditional.

Future books can be written on Vatican Council II interpreted with the rational premise, inference and conclusion.There will be a hermeneutic of continuity with the past.

The pro- SSPX books on Vatican Council II which are contaminated with this error include those by authors Christina Siccardi, Paulo Pasqualucci, Roberto dei Mattei, Diana Montagna, Maria Guarini and Enrico M.Radaeilli.

There have been hundreds of thousands of books worldwide on Vatican Council II, which were written with an irrational premise to produce a fake non traditional conclusion.This could have been avoided if the authors were informed about the mistake and avoided it.

The official interpretation of Vatican Council II is non Magisterial since its theological foundation is based upon an objective and empirical error which could have been avoided.The Holy Spirit cannot make a factual error and contradict the past Magisterium. There is no new Revelation in the Catholic Church.

With the fake or rational premise, the understanding of Vatican Council II changes, in the Church.-Lionel Andrades