In my parish the priests, catechists and parishioners interpret the Nicene and Athanasius Creed irrationally : this is a public mortal sin , our profession of faith is different

In my parish the priests and catachists interpret unknown cases of the baptism of desire(BOD) and invincible ignorance(I.I) as being known people and objective examples of salvation outside the Church and so practical exceptions to the Athanasius Creed.This Creed  says all need the Catholic faith for salvation, and the Creed does not mention any exceptions.

For me unknown cases of the BOD and I.I cannot be known and objective exceptions to the Athanasius Creed.

The priests and catechists and the parishioners cannot affirm the Athanasius Creed and the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus(EENS).This is first class heresy and a public mortal sin.They do not deny this.

In this condition, without their ending the scandal, I have to go up to receive the Eucharsit at Holy Mass in Italian.

Aside from the Athanasius Creed there is a problem also with the Nicene Creed.For me the Nicene Creed says “I believe in one baptism for the forgiveness of sins”,it is a reference to the baptism of water.I don’t know of any one saved with the BOD or I.I.

I don’t know of any one saved outside the Catholic Church with faith and the baptism of water.

But for the priests, catechists and parishioners of Santa Maria di Nazareth, Casalotti,Boccea,Rome,the Nicene Creeds really says, « I believe in three or more baptisms for the forgiveness of sin, desire, blood , invincible ignorance etc and they exclude the baptism of water in the Catholic Church( and so there are practical exceptions to Feeneyite EENS for them).So the understanding of the Nicene Creeds has been changed. This is public mortal sin.

The parish’s understanding of the Nicene Creed and my understanding is different.So our Profession of Faith at Holy Mass would also be different.

And I have to go up to receive the Eucharist at Mass without them recanting and correcting the error, which is common in this diocese of Porta Santa Rufina, now under the administration of the Archbishop of Civitavecchia and the Vatican.

Priests and lay people are expected to affirm the Creeds without any innovation.

With BOD and I.I referring to visible people saved outside the Church( and so there is alleged known salvation outside the Church) the First Commandment is different today for Catholics.It means that there is not only true worship in the Catholic Church but also in other religions which have false worship and idols.-Lionel Andrades

 JUNE 17, 2021

There are good priests in my parish but they interpret the Creeds and Magisterial documents irrationally : St. Alphonsus Liguori says do not go up to receive the Eucharist from a priest in public mortal sin

There are good priests in the parish Santa Maria di Nazareth,Casalotti, Boccea, Rome.However St.Alphonsus Liguori, father of Moral Theology says that if there is a priest in public mortal sin do not go up to receive the Eucharist from him. Since if you do so you would be telling him all is well even though his soul is oriented to Hell. St. Alphonsus says that if there is no other means to fulfill your Sunday obligation, then go up to him to receive the Eucharist at Mass ( Teologia Moralis, Bk.3,N.46).In my parish, like the rest of the diocese, the priests interpret the Creeds irrationally since it is politically correct with the Left and the Vatican.They reject the Athanasius Creed, the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus and the Syllabus of Errors with the same false premise. Then they interpret the Catechisms and Vatican Council II with the same false premise creating a false rupture with Tradition(EENS etc).

How am I to go up to receive the Eucharist from them ? -Lionel Andrades

https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2021/06/there-are-good-priest-in-my-parish-but.html

 JUNE 19, 2021

Annual parish fete tomorrow - stall needed for Catechesis

https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2021/06/annual-parish-fete-tomorrow-stall.html