Rorate Caeili and Don Pietro Leone still interpret Vatican Council II like the liberal US bishops

 “The Council and the Eclipse of God” Part XI “How the Council jettisoned true Catholic Evangelisation for shallow Ecumenism” by Don Pietro Leone,Rorate Caeili webblog

Yes it is true that since the Council Fathers used the false premise to reject the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus and they accepted this error in the Letter of the Holy Office 1949(LOHO), some of them chose to create a New Theology, a New Ecumenism and we can see the results in the Church, as Don Pietro Leone also has observed.

But Don Leone does not have to interpret EENS and Vatican Council II with the false premise as did the popes, the liberals, Archbishop Marcel Lefebvre and the present US bishops.

He can choose to interpret Unitatis Redintigratio, the Decree on Ecumenism, Vatican Council II without the false premise, without confusing what is invisible as being visible. Then Vatican Council II is being interpreted without the New Theology and there is no rupture with the old ecumenism of return to the Catholic Church.-Lionel Andrades

https://rorate-caeli.blogspot.com/2021/06/the-council-and-eclipse-of-god-part-xi.html