The priests in my parish interpret the Creeds with a fake premise and do not deny it. They agree with me.It is the same with the rest of the diocese.
They interpret the baptism of desire, baptism of blood and invincible ignorance with a fake premise and they agree that they do so. So they do not affirm the strict interpretation of the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus(EENS).
They interpret Vatican Council II with an irrationality and admit that they do so, like the rest of the diocese and the present two popes.
All this is unethical and dishonest and is common."So what?", could be the common reaction in the parish.
Even the Catechism is interpreted irrationally and so is politically correct with the Left.
Simply reject Tradition, is the message.
The Sacraments are available for all. They call this 'pastoral'.They also have a pastoral and non dogmatic approach in the interpretation of Vatican Council II. -Lionel Andrades
UNE 26, 2021
The problem in Dijon, Franace is the same as the diocese in which I live in Rome, Porta Santa Rufina.Here the Latin Mass was stopped and the seminary of Fr. Stefano Mannelli f.i remains closed.The issue for me is Vatican Council II interpreted with or without a false premise, and not the liturgy.
The problem in Dijon, Franace is the same as the diocese in which I live in Rome, Porta Santa Rufina.Here the Latin Mass was stopped and the seminary of Fr. Stefano Mannelli f.i remains closed.The issue for me is Vatican Council II interpreted with or without a false premise, and not the liturgy. I have been going for Mass in Italian at the parish Santa Maria di Nazareth, Casalotti, Boccea, and have been affirming the strict interpretation of the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus(EENS), the Syllabus of Errors with no exceptions.I did not have to reject Tradition.I would attend the Novus Ordo Mass and still affirm the Athansius Creed with no known exceptions.I could do all this without rejecting Vatican Council II, interpreted without the false premise.So the Council has no exceptions for EENS, for me.Vatican Council II is not a rupture with EENS as it was interpreted by the missionaries of the 16th century. There is a hermeneutic of continuity with Tradition and no development of doctrine.
For me there is no New Theology of Rahner and Ratzinger, since there is no false premise used.It's simple.
There is no development of doctrine possible, since I avoid the false premise, inference and conclusion.
Pope Francis, Pope Benedict and the cardinals and bishops are not Magisterial on Vatican Council II for me, since they use a fake premise, a lie, to interpret the Council and then create a false rupture with Tradition. It is the same in the other dioceses of Rome. -Lionel Andrades
JUNE 25, 2021
In my parish there is no unity on the First Commandment, the interpretation of the Nicene Creed is different and the Athanasius Creed is rejected : under these conditions I have to go up to receive the Eucharist
Posts
No comments:
Post a Comment