This is priceless information : the Congregatio for the Doctrine of the Faith will not tell you about it

You can interpret Vatican Council II with a false premise and your conclusion will be different.

You can interpret extra ecclesiam nulla salus (EENS)with a false premise and your conclusion will be different.

You can interpret the baptism of desire and being saved in invincible ignorance with or without the false premise and your conclusion will be different.

You can interpret the Syllabus of Errors of Pope Pius IX with or without the false premise and your conclusion will be different, irrespective if you are a conservative or liberal.
You can interpret the Athanasius Creed with or without the false premise and it will be the difference between heresy and orthodoxy.
Nicene Creed…-the same.
Apostles Creed…-the same.
Catechism of the Council of Trent, Catechism of Pope Pius X, Catechism of the Catholic Church…-the same.
The Letter of the Holy Office 1949 (LOHO) placed in the Denzinger and referenced at Vatican Council II interprets BOD and I.I with the false premise and so its conclusion is a rupture with the traditional strict interpretation of EENS.This is priceless information.The Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith will not tell you about it.
The LOHO uses a false premise to create a New Theology and liberals and conservatives unknowingly go along with it.-Lionel Andrades