When they do not affirm the strict interpretation of EENS and project
unknown cases of the baptism of desire and invincible ignorance as being
exceptions, to 16th century EENS why do they want the Franscisan Friars at Medugorje
to be politically incorrect with the Left ? The late Fr. Henrik Hoser could
also be politically correct like them to reject ecclesiocentrism and support a
vague Christocentrism.
The same could be said about the Lefebvrists. They interpret the
Creeds and Catechisms with a false premise and consider this traditional.This
is even though the liberals whom they criticize use the same irrationality to
create the New Theology.
Lionel Andrades
Promoter of the Lionel Andrades interpretation of Vatican Council II.Vatican Council II is dogmatic and not only pastoral.
Catholic lay man in Rome,
Writer on the discovery of the two interpretations of Vatican Council II, one is rational and the other is irrational, one is interpreted with the false premise and the other without it. One is Magisterial and the other, the common one, is non Magisterial.
It is the same for the Creeds and Catechisms.There can be two interpretations.
Why should Catholics choose an irrational version which is heretical, non traditional and schismatic, when a rational option is there which is traditional ?
Blog: Eucharist and Mission (eucharistandmission )
E-mail: lionelandrades10@gmail.com
___________________
Posts
No comments:
Post a Comment