In this report in the Los Angeles Times the newspaper
is referring only to Vatican Council II interpreted with the false premise,
inference and conclusion and not the rational premise and inference which
produces a traditional conclusion with the hermeneutic of continuity with the
Athanasius Creed, the Syllabus of Errors of Pope Pius IX etc.-Lionel Andrades
Pope reimposes restrictions on Latin Mass, infuriating Catholic traditionalists
Pope Francis cracked down Friday on the spread of the old Latin Mass, reversing one of Pope Benedict XVI’s signature decisions in a major challenge to traditionalist Roman Catholics who immediately decried it as an attack on them and the ancient liturgy.
Francis reimposed restrictions on celebrating the Latin Mass that Benedict relaxed in 2007, and went further to limit its use. The pontiff said he was doing so because his predecessor’s reform had become a source of division in the church and been exploited by Catholics opposed to the Second Vatican Council, the 1960s meetings that modernized the church and its liturgy.
Critics said they had never before witnessed a pope so thoroughly reversing a decision by his predecessor. That the reversal concerned something so fundamental as the liturgy, while Benedict is still alive and living in the Vatican as a retired pope, only amplified the extraordinary nature of Francis’ move, which will surely result in more right-wing hostility directed at him.
Francis, 84, issued a new law requiring individual bishops to approve celebrations of the old Mass, also called the Tridentine Mass, and requiring newly ordained priests to receive explicit permission to celebrate it from their bishops in consultation with the Vatican.
Under the new law, bishops must also determine if the current groups of faithful attached to the old Mass accept Vatican II, which allowed for Mass to be celebrated in the vernacular rather than Latin. These groups can no longer use regular churches; instead, bishops must find alternate locations for them without creating new parishes.
In addition, Francis said bishops are no longer allowed to authorize the formation of any new pro-Latin Mass groups in their dioceses.
The move immediately created an uproar among traditionalists already opposed to Francis’ more progressive bent and still nostalgic for Benedict’s conservative papacy.Francis said he was taking action to promote unity and heal divisions within the church that had grown since Benedict’s 2007 document, Summorum Pontificum. He said he based his decision on a 2020 Vatican survey of all the world’s bishops, whose “responses reveal a situation that preoccupies and saddens me, and persuades me of the need to intervene.”
“This is an extremely disappointing document which entirely undoes the legal provisions” of Benedict’s 2007 document, said Joseph Shaw, chairman of the Latin Mass Society of England and Wales.
Though Latin celebrations can continue, “the presumption is consistently against them. Bishops are being invited to close them down,” Shaw said, adding that the requirement for Latin Masses to be held outside a parish was “unworkable...”
The opportunity offered by Benedict, the pope said in a letter to bishops accompanying the new law, was instead “exploited to widen the gaps, reinforce the divergences, and encourage disagreements that injure the Church, block her path, and expose her to the peril of division.”
Francis said he was “saddened” that he use of the old Mass was accompanied by a rejection of Vatican II itself “with unfounded and unsustainable assertions, that it betrayed the Tradition and the ‘true Church.’”
“Francis hits it right on the head with his observation that Benedict’s 2007 loosening of regulations against the Latin rite allowed others to use it for division,” he said. “The blowback proves his point.”
The blowback was indeed fierce, though it’s also likely that many opponents will simply ignore Francis’ decree and continue as before under sympathetic bishops. Some of these traditionalists and Catholics already were among Francis’ fiercest critics, with some accusing him of heresy for having opened the door to letting divorced and civilly remarried Catholics receive Communion...
Traditionalists have insisted that the old liturgy was never abrogated and that Benedict’s 2007 reform had allowed it to flourish.
They point to the growth of traditionalist parishes, often frequented by young, large families, as well as new religious orders that celebrate the old liturgy. The Latin Mass Society claims that the number of traditional Masses celebrated each Sunday in England and Wales more than doubled since 2007, from 20 to 46.
But for many, the writing was on the wall as soon as Francis stepped out onto the loggia of St. Peter’s Basilica after his 2013 election without the ermine-trimmed red velvet cape that was preferred by Benedict and is a symbol of the pre-Vatican II church.
The restrictions on the Latin Mass went into immediate effect with the law’s publication in Friday’s official Vatican newspaper, L’Osservatore Romano.
https://www.latimes.com/world-nation/story/2021-07-16/pope-reverses-benedict-reimposes-restrictions-latin-mass
________________________
AUGUST 2, 2021
The popes from Paul VI to Francis have interpreted Vatican Council II with the false premise when they could have maintained the continuity with Tradition by using the rational premise.The newspapers do not mention this fact in their reports on Traditionis Custode
Posts
No comments:
Post a Comment