There is a rational and irrational interpretation of Vatican Council II and Cardinal Walter Kasper cited the irrational version to justify Amoris Laetitia, Cardinal Claudio Hummes did the same at the Amazon Synod and Pope Francis did the same at Abu Dhabi and with Traditionis Custode

 

There is a rational and irrational interpretation of Vatican Council II and Cardinal Walter Kasper cited the irrational version to justify Amoris Laetitia, Cardinal Claudio Hummes did the same at the Amazon Synod and Pope Francis did the same at Abu Dhabi and with Traditionis Custode.This is not known to the SSPX since like Archbishop Lefebvre , their bishops and priests only know of the irrational interpretation of Vatican Council II.

This was not known to the St. Benedict Centers who were interpreting Vatican Council II irrationally and as a break with Feeneyite extra ecclesiam nulla salus(EENS).

This is also not known to the sedevacantists CMRI and MHFM who do not interpret Vatican Council II rationally by not confusing what is invisible as being visible.-Lionel Andrades

https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2021/07/but-cardinals-and-bishops-use-false.html

Lionel Andrades

Promoter of the Lionel Andrades interpretation of Vatican Council II.For him the Council is dogmatic and not only pastoral.

Writer on the discovery of the two interpretations of Vatican Council II, one is rational and the other is irrational, one is interpreted with the false premise and the other without it. One is Magisterial and the other, the common one, is non Magisterial.

It is the same for the Creeds and Catechisms.

There can be two interpretations.

Why should Catholics choose an irrational version which is heretical, non traditional and schismatic, when a rational option is there which is traditional ?

Blog: Eucharist and Mission (eucharistandmission )

E-mail: lionelandrades10@gmail.com

___________________