Friday, August 13, 2021

We need unity on the Athanasius Creed ( with no exceptions ), the Syllabus of Errors ( with no exceptions), the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus ( with the baptism of desire and invincible ignorance not being practical exceptions) and the Great Commission ( with no known exceptions), as they were interpreted over the centuries. But with the use of the deceptive false premise, exceptions are created and these documents are negated by even the popes, cardinals and bishops.

 


We need unity on the Athanasius Creed ( with no exceptions ), the Syllabus of Errors ( with no exceptions), the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus ( with the baptism of desire and invincible ignorance not being practical exceptions) and the Great Commission ( with no known exceptions), as they were interpreted over the centuries. But with the use of the deceptive false premise, exceptions are created  and these documents are negated by even the popes, cardinals and bishops.

So when the popes and the ecclesiastics do not affirm the faith what can be expected from  Catholics at large ?

Cardinal Raymond Burke like Cardinal Walter Kasper affirm  these three documents with exceptions and so does Pope Francis and the SSPX and the FSSP.

So why should any one recite a Profession of Faith at Holy Mass in the vernacular ? Why should the bishop recite the Oath of Office of the Bishop ?Since we do not have unity on doctrine ?

In my parish the priests have to say that invisible cases in Vatican Council II in 2021(LG 8, LG 14, LG 16, UR 3, NA 2,GS 22 etc) are visible exceptions for the Athanasius Creed, the Syllabus of Errors, the dogma EENS and the proclamation of the Great Commission.So they reject the proclamation of the Social Reign of Christ the King in all politics, since there is alleged known salvation outside the Church. This is also the official position of the liberals and conservative Catholics.



Bishop Roland Minnerath and the diocesan priests  may offer the Latin Mass but they are interpreting these three documents with the false premise and so are the Latin laity in Dijone, France.

Peter Kwasniewksi, Taylor Marshall and Roberto dei Mattei are doing the same. They promote the same liberalism as the liberals and conservatives in the Church, when they confuse what is invisible as being visible and then create exceptions for the traditional ecclesiocentrism of the Catholic Church.



There is unity in error now and no one has brought out this point in the many reports on Traditionis Custode.

The false premise is  like a theological epidemic which has spread through out the Church and no one reports and talks about it as they do regarding COVID 19. -Lionel Andrades


https://www.crisismagazine.com/2021/the-ongoing-debate-over-extra-ecclesiam-nulla-salus

http://connecticutcatholiccorner.blogspot.com/2018/07/how-can-dogma-change.html

3 comments:

Anonymous said...

hello i cant decide between sedevacantism and being part of Vatican II


MHFM says anyone part of Vatican II will go to hell

Anonymous said...

should I be sedevacantist if no, then why?

Also MHFM condems Vatican II

Anonymous said...

should I be sedevacantist if no, then why?

Also MHFM condems Vatican II