With the Lionel Andrades interpretation of Vatican Council II the Catholics in Dijon , France could ask Bishop Roland Minnerath to quit if he cannot affirm the Catholic Faith in public. They could ask the Archbishop of Valencia, Spain to do the same

With the Lionel Andrades interpretation of Vatican Council II the Catholics in Dijon , France could ask Bishop Roland Minnerath to quit if he cannot affirm the Catholic Faith in public. They could ask the Archbishop of Valencia, Spain to do the same.

Pope Francis and Cardinal Ladaria would emerge non Magisterial on Vatican Council II, the Councils, Catechisms and the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus.

The LA interpretation of Church Documents avoids the false premise , which Bishop Minnerath needs to project ‘ a theology of religions’, or religous pluralism, .

With the rational premise, however he is helpless and has to come back to Tradition.

The Archbishop of Valencia, too, with the rational premise, inference and traditional conclusion, would have to affirm the traditional ecclesiology of the 12th,13th,14tyh,15th and 16th centuries.

For Pope Francis and Cardinal Ladaria this would be ‘politically agnostic’, ‘ideological’  and ‘nostalgic’.

With the LA interpretation of Vatican Council II they stand exposed.Catholics could tell them that it is only because they do not use the rational premise like  LA, that they are not ‘rigid’, ‘extremist’ or ‘racist’, political terms of the Left, to control Catholic theology.

With the LA interpretation of Vatican Council II we go back to the present ecclesiology of the FSSP in Dijone, France. The FSSP should remain in Dijone and ask Bishop Minnerath to formally and publically affirm the Catholic Faith.

The people should demand that the bishop be a Catholic or quit his office. This is Canon Law.

In France they could appeal to Le Pen to interpret 

Vatican Council II with a rational premise and set an 

example for Bishop Minerath and the French Bishops Conference.-Lionel Andrades

Lionel Andrades

Promotore dell'interpretazione di Lionel Andrades del Concilio Vaticano II. Per lui il Concilio è dogmatico e non solo pastorale.

Scrittore sulla scoperta delle due interpretazioni del Concilio Vaticano II, l'una razionale e l'altra irrazionale, si interpreta l'una con la falsa premessa e l'altra senza. Uno è Magistrale e l'altro, quello comune, è non Magistrale.

Lo stesso vale per i Credo ei Catechismi.
Ci possono essere due interpretazioni.
Perché i cattolici dovrebbero scegliere una versione irrazionale che è eretica, non tradizionale e scismatica, quando c'è un'opzione razionale che è tradizionale?
Blog: Eucharist and Mission (eucharistandmission )

E-mail: lionelandrades10@gmail.com

AUGUST 4, 2021

Poland and Hungary need to adopt the Lionel Andrades interpretation of Vatican Council II https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2021/08/poland-and-hungary-need-to-adopt-lionel.html

________________