Archbishop Marcel Lefebvre was interpreting the baptism of
desire and invincible ignorance with the false premise of the Letter of the
Holy Office . So he changed the interpretation of the Creeds and Catechisms. He
rejected Tradition.He also chose an irrational interpretation of Vatican
Council II. This doctrinal chaos is followed by the SSPX bishops and the sedevacantist bishops and
priests who had their formation under
him. They were in schism like the liberals and the popes. The fake premise
creates heresy and schism.
At the Catholic Identiy Conference they will continue to
interpret Vatican Council II with the false premise and not the rational
premise. They will also interpret the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus
according to the mistake in the Letter of the Holy Office 1949.This is not our
Catholic identity.
This is being political correct with the Left in the name of Tradition.
Michael Matt’s father and Archbishop Lefebvre had used the false
premise to interpret the Creeds, Catechisms, EENS and Vatican Council II like
the liberals and the ecclesiastics of that time.It was the same with Michael
Davies and Dietrich von Hildebrand. I have mentioned this before and no one
denies it.
It is because of the error of Michael Davies and Dietrich von Hildebrand that Una Voce International(Davies) and the Roman Forum ( Hildebrand) did not correct Pope Francis’ interpretation of Vatican Council II with the false premise, in Traditionis Custode.
They did not correct Andre Grillo and 180 signatories who critized the Latin Mass based upon their irrational interpretation of Vatican Council II.They did not correct this mistake of the false premise, at the Amazon Synod and in the Abu Statement etc. etc.-Lionel Andrades
SEPTEMBER 26, 2021
Archbishop Marcel Lefebvre interpreted Vatican Council II with the false premise, the right hand side column and he was followed in the error by Michael Davies, Dietrich von Hildebrand, Chris Ferrara,, Roberto dei Matteo, Fr. Nicholas Gruner. The SSPX bishops are still interpreting Magisterial documents with the false premise
Archbishop Marcel Lefebvre interpreted Vatican Council II with the false premise, the right hand side column and he was followed in the error by Michael Davies, Dietrich von Hildebrand, Chris Ferrara,, Roberto dei Matteo, Fr. Nicholas Gruner. The SSPX bishops are still interpreting Magisterial documents with the false premise
No comments:
Post a Comment