Sunday, October 10, 2021

Bishop Peter Libasci and Fr. Georges de Laire need to settle a secular issue

Fr.Georges de Laire, Judicial Vicar in the Dioceseof Manchester, USA with the approval of Pope Francis, Cardinal Ladaria and Bishop Peter Libasci, has placed restrictions on the St. Benedict Center, New Hampshire, USA, for not interpreting the baptism of desire (LG 14) etc with the False Premise ( invisible people are visible in 2021), confusing what is invisible as being visible, to create a fake rupture with the traditional strict interpretation of extra ecclesiam nulla salus, with no exceptions.We know that this is unethical and dishonest. But is it legal ?

This is a secular issue.Do Catholics in New Hampshire have to claim that they can physically see non Catholics saved outside the Church, without 'faith and baptism'(AG 7) in 1965-2021 ?

Must they claim that they can explicitly see non Catholics in New Hampshire, saved in invincible ignorance and without the baptism of water ?

What is the physical reality of Fr. Georges de Laire, can he see such people ? Has he met them ?

This is a secular issue since it refers to the physical observation, at an empirical level, in Newton's time, space and matter.

If Fr.Georges de Laire can see physically visible non Catholics saved in invincible ignorance outside the Church, without faith and baptism, then his reality is different from the other normal human beings in New Hampshire.

Phil Lawler. Anthony Burgess and the rest of the faculty at the Thomas College of Liberal Arts, New Hampshire, are 'legally Catholic ' for Fr. Georges de Laire. Since they can see non Catholics in New Hampshire saved without faith and the baptism of water and so have made the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus, obsolete.

The Diocese of Manchester needs to clarify that Fr. Georges de Laire cannot physically see non Catholics in New Hampshire saved outside the Church with the baptism of desire or invincible ignorance, otherwise he would be making an objective error.

Similarly Mary Ellen Mahon, Kelly Goodreau and Fr. Matthew Mason and other members of the Curia canot physically see or meet any exceptions for EENS in the diocese.

The St. Benedict Center, NH has a right to reject the False Premise being opposed upon them . The Decree of Prohibitions is coercion.It would be the same other Catholics in the diocese who attend Holy Mass in Latin or English.Some would feel entitled to relief and compensation for the error from the diocese.-Lionel Andrades

BR. ANDRE MARIE OF ST. BENEDICT’S CENTER

https://www.churchmilitant.com/video/episode/intv-br.-andre-marie-of-st.-benedicts-center

https://www.churchmilitant.com/news/article/vicar-of-manchester-changes-dogma-into-heresy

_______________________________

JUNE 10, 2020

Diocese of Manchester, USA and CDF grant canonical status for religious communities which interpret Vatican Council II with a false premise, inference and conclusion

The Diocese of Manchester, USA interprets 1) Vatican Council II 2) baptism of desire, baptism of blood and invincible ignorance 3) Catechism of the Catholic Church 4) extra ecclesiam nulla salus (EENS) and the 5 ) Athanasius Creed with a false premise and inference to create a non traditional conclusion.This is approved by the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith(CDF) officials who want the St.Benedict Center,USA, in the diocese, to do the same. All the religious communities in the diocese are obliged to interpret magisterial documents with a false premise to receive canonical recognition.

The St.Benedict Center interprets EENS without the false premise.It does not have canonical recognition.

The FSSP uses the false premise.It is recognised.

All the priests who offer Holy Mass in Latin or English have to use the false premise to interpret the Creeds.This is heresy.It is an impediment to offering Holy Mass.

Propaganda Lgbt "nel nome di Dio". Phil Lawler: "Atto gravissimo ...

The Thomas More College of Liberal Arts 1 is in the diocese of Manchester.Phil Lawler teaches there.He chooses to interpret Vatican Council II with the false premise.Anthony Esolen also taught at this institution and was approved by Bishop Peter Libasci and the CDF.

-Lionel Andrades

1
REPOSTS

Thomas More College of Liberal Arts branch in Rome is teaching irrationality and heresy to project a liberal image and attract students like their principal office in Manchester, USA.Phil Lawler is a teacher at this college and he goes along with the deception.

With the connivance of the Bishop Peter Libasci, the bishop of Manchester, they present Vatican Council II with Lumen Gentium being an exception to the past exclusivist ecclesiology , an ecumenism of return, the Syllabus of Errors of Pope Pius IX and the Athanasius Creed.The faculty at the college do not want to interpret Vatican Council II in harmony with the past exclusivist ecclesiology as it was known to the Jesuit missionaries in the 16th century.

Students in Rome are not being taught the truths about the Catholic faith, for political and financial reasons.

This is unethical.

Education is a business in Rome.

An accreditation would not be given to the college, by the Leftist government in Italy if the college did not present philosophy and theology with deception.

The Catholic political parties should be protesting outside the offices of the Thomas More College of Liberal Arts in Rome, to defend the culture, history and religion of Italy.

The college must be asked to affirm Vatican Council II and to teach the students the truth about the Council interpreted rationally.Students are taught the Catholic classics but Vatican Council II is taught as contradicting the saints and popes of the past.-Lionel Andrades

https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2019/09/the-catholic-political-parties-should.html