To change the
interpretation of extra ecclesiam nulla
salus (EENS), the baptism of desire, baptism of blood and invincibile ignorance,
the Athanasius Creed, the Syllabus of Errors, the Catechism of the Catholic
Church 847-848 ( invincible ignorance) etc by confusing invisible cases as
being visible and practical examples of salvation outside the Church is
condoning artificial heresy. It results
in schism with the present Magisterium.
I have mentioned that
the Lefebvrists Roberto dei Mattei, Joseph Shaw, Maike Hickson, John Henry
Weston and Archbishop Vigano also confuse hypothetical cases of LG 8, LG 14, lG
16 etc as being practical exceptions to EENS, Athanasius Creed, Syllabus of Errors.
For them there are literal cases of the baptism of desire (LG 14). Implicit cases are projected as being explicit examples of salvation among non Catholics in 1965-2021.All this is irrational.It is also heretical.It contradicts EENS, Athanasius Creed and schism( a break with the Council of Trent etc ).This creates division in the Church with the False Premise ( invisible cases are visible in 2021, there are practical exeptions for EENS etc ).
This is also the heresy
and schism of the popes from Pope Pius
XII ( on EENS) and Pope Paul VI ( Vatican Council II).The mainstream Catholic
Church has to choose the Rational Choice ( invisible cases are invisible, LG 14
refers to a hypothetical and theoretical case only in 2021).
Chris Ferrara and Roberto
dei Mattei cannot justify heresy and schism by saying that Pope Francis is also
doing the same.
If someone goes for
the Latin Mass it does not make him a traditionalist.Lefebvrists support
heresy, schism and division, with the False Premise.It is the same as the
liberals. They don’t deny it.
Eric Sammons, the Editor in Chief of Crisis Magazine does not deny it.He uses the False Premise to interpret Vatican Council II, EENS etc.Like Allen Shreck and Scott Hahn at the Faculty of Theology, University of Steubenville, Ohio,USA,he interprets Vatican Council II and EENS with the False Premise just like Pope Francis.They do not deny it. They agree with me.
Crisis Magazine states that
they are a voice for the faithful Catholic laity.They are faithful to the
liberal teachings of the Catholic Church; with the hermeneutic of rupture with Tradition.
With the False Premise Sammons creates heresy and schism which are mortal sins of faith.Then he asks for donation.Remember this when you send them your donations. It is the same with LifeSite News and John Henry Weston.Like Peter Kwasniewski and the other Lefebvrists they are denying Tradition and they are asking for donations from traditionalists.They interpret Magisterial documents like the liberals.
I do not use the False
Premise and I do not ask for donations.-Lionel Andrades
OCTOBER 7, 2021
Cardinal Marx and Michael Matt Editor Remnant News use the same False Premise to interpret Vatican Council II
Both Cardinal Marx and Michael Matt are using the same Fake Premise to interpret Vatican Council II and so break with Tradition, especially Magisterial Documents which support exclusive salvation in the Catholic Church.Michael Matt is the Editor of Remnant TV. He believes that there is division between traditionalists and liberals.This is seen in the Latin Mass for him.But this division was really created by the False Premise.This was not know to Archbishop Marcel Lefebvre.It was also unknown to Cardinal Marx.
If they all simply used the Rational Premise to interpret Vatican Council II there would be a continuity with Tradition, especially ecclesiocentrism.
Bishop Athanasius Schneider and Dr. Taylor Marshall have said that there are no literal cases of the baptism of desire(LG 14).There are no explicit cases of the implicit baptism of desire of St. Thomas Aquinas.But for the liberals and traditionalists the baptism of desire is explicit.Physically visible. So extra ecclesiam nulla salus becomes obsolete for Cardinal Marx and Michael Matt.-Lionel Andrades
No comments:
Post a Comment