Vatican Council II by Bishop Roland Minnerath and Lionel Andrades

 

JUNE 30, 2021

Interpretation of Vatican Council II by Bishop Roland Minnerath and Lionel Andrades

 

                                                    https://www.churchmilitant.com/news/article/laity-protest-latin-mass-hating-archbishop

INTERPRETATION OF VATICAN COUNCIL II BY BISHOP ROLAND MINNERATH AND LIONEL ANDRADES

Bishop Roland Minnerath has interpreted Vatican Council II with the false premise and with this error has written a book on 'the theology of religions' he has also interpreted the Syllabus of Errors with a false premise and published books with this error which now are obsolete. Bishop Roland Minnerath uses the fake premise, inference and conclusion to interpret Vatican Council II and the Syllabus of Errors of Pope Pius IX.So there is a rupture with Tradition. If he used the rational premise, inference and conclusion there would be no rupture with Tradition.

So his books are obsolete. They were written with a false premise to create a non traditional conclusion.

With the false premise he changes the original interpretation of the Creeds,Catechisms and the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus.With the rational premise he would emerge a traditionalist like the FSSP. The FSSP reject Vatican Council II interpreted with the false premise and go back to traditional sources of the Catholic Church.

 

FAKE PREMISE OF BISHOP ROLAND MINNERATH

Lumen Gentium 8,Lumen Gentium 14, Lumen Gentium 16 etc in Vatican Council II refer to physically visible cases in 1965-2021.

 

FAKE INFERENCE OF BISHOP ROLAND MINNERATH

They are objective examples of salvation outside the Church.

 

FAKE CONCLUSION OF BISHOP ROLAND MINNERATH

Vatican Council II contradicts the strict interpretation of the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus (EENS).The Athanasius Creed(outside the Church there is no salvation) and the Syllabus of Errors of Pope Pius IX ( ecumenism of return) were made obsolete.

Here is my interpretation of Vatican Council II in blue.

 

RATIONAL PREMISE OF LIONEL ANDRADES

LG 8, LG 14, LG 16 etc in Vatican Council II refer to physically invisible cases in 1965-2021.They are only hypothetical and theoretical. They exist only in our mind and are not solid bodies at Newton's level of time, space and matter.

 

RATIONAL INFERENCE OF LIONEL ANDRADES

They are not objective examples of salvation outside the Church for us human beings.

 

RATIONAL CONCLUSION OF LIONEL ANDRADES

Vatican Council II does not contradict EENS as it was interpreted by the Jesuits in the Middle Ages.It does not contradict the strict interpretation of EENS of St. Thomas Aquinas( saved in invincible ignorance is invisible), St. Augustine and Fr. Leonard Feeney of Boston.

The Letter of the Holy Office(Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith) 1949 made an objective mistake it used the false premise, inference and conclusion.-Lionel Andrades

 

 

June 29, 2021

Bishop Roland Minnerath has interpreted Vatican Council II with the false premise and with this error has written a book on 'the theology of religions' he has also interpreted the Syllabus of Errors with a false premise and published books with this error

http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2021/06/bishop-roland-minnerath-has-interpreted

JUNE 29, 2021

In Dijon, France Catholics do not have unity on the First Commandment, the Creeds, Catechisms, Extra ecclesiam nulla salus and Vatican Council II and Bishop Roland Minnerath is allowed to offer Holy Mass. The laity could ask the bishop and the fssp priests, religious communities and parishiones, to interpret Vatican Council Ii and Magisterial documents without the fake premise and instead to use the rational premise

https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2021/06/in-dijon-france-catholics-do-not-have.html

https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2021/06/interpretation-of-vatican-council-ii-by.html