Eucharistic 'reforms' with Vatican Council II interpreted with the False Premise according to Traitionis Custode

 Since then, the decree has become a lightning rod for a vocal minority group of Catholics who still favor the traditional Latin Mass, many of whom also have expressed skepticism or even outright rejection of the reforms of Vatican II and of the legitimacy of Francis.- Christopher White, National Catholic Reporter, Pope Francis approves further restrictions on Latin Mass to ensure adherence to Vatican II Dec 18, 2021

Eucharistic 'Reforms'

Traditionis Custode creates division on the Eucharist it supports sacrilege and scandal when it changes the interpretation of Vatican Council II with a False Premise.

The New Theology and the old theology are related to who receives the Eucharist.Traditionis Custode interprets Vatican Council II irrationally and creates ecclesial division on the Eucharist etc.

Traditionis Custode promotes ecclesial division on the Eucharist with the Fake Premise. The laity are obliged to reject it and ask Pope Francis to interpret Vatican Council II rationally. This would be Magisterial. 

The past ecclesiocentrism of the Catholic Church is made obsolete with the use of the Fake Premise.With the Fake Premise the reasoning is  invisible cases are physically visible in 1965-2021, Lumen Gentium 16(invincible ignorance), for example, is an example of visible salvation outside the Church.It is a practical exception for the Athanasius Creed, dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus (EENS) etc).

If the popes from Paul VI had interpreted Vatican Council II with the Rational Premise there would not be a new ecclesiology, new ecumenism, etc since the Council would support the Athanasius Creed which states Whosoever will be saved, before all things it is necessary that he hold the catholic faith. Which faith unless every one do keep whole and undefiled, without doubt he shall perish everlastingly.

'EUCHARISIC REFORMS' : CARDINAL WALTER KASPER

1.So Cardinal Walter Kasper could say that since the ecclesiology of the Church had been changed with Vatican Council II (interpreted with the False Premise) the Eucharist could also be given to the divorced and remarried.

But in Vatican Council II interpreted with the Rational Premise (invisible cases are physically invisible in 1965-2021, Lumen Gentium 16(invincible ignorance), for example, is an example of an invisible person and so not an objective example of salvation, outside the Church and so is not a practical exception for the Athanasius Creed, dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus (EENS) etc.So the past ecclesiocentrism of the Catholic Church is not obsolete and is still valid. So Cardinal Walter Kasper cannot say that since the ecclesiology of the Church has been changed with Vatican Council II (interpreted with the Rational Premise)  the Eucharist could also be given to the divorced and remarried.The ecclesiology of the Church has not been changed with Vatican Council II ( interpreted with a Rational Premise ).

'EUCHARISTIC REFORMS' : CARDINAL MARX

2.Similarly Cardinal Reinhardt Marx cites Vatican Council II ( False Premise) to justify a change in the ecclesiology of the Church. He cites Vatican Council II ( False Premise) to rationalise the German Synodal Way and giving the Eucharist at the Novus Ordo Mass, to Protestants and other non believers. For him outside the Church there is known salvation, LG 8,LG 14, LG 16 etc in Vatican Council II are objective exceptions for EENS and the Athanasius Creed. This is the New Theology which says outside the Church there is salvation.

But if he chose Vatican Council II ( Rational Premise ) there would be no New Theology and the Church would still teach, for  him, the old theology which says outside the Church there is no salvation. So again the issue is the Eucharist. 

So now  when a bishop interprets Vatican Council II with the False Premise instead of the Rational Premise and gives the Eucharist  to non Christians, the laity must know that he really interprets the Council II irrationally, with the Fake Premise.He also expects them to do the same. This is the message of Traditionis Custode.It interprets Vatican Council II irrationally and creates ecclesial division on the Eucharist.

They must ask the bishop to reject Traditionis Custode and interpret Vatican Council II with the Rational Premise, this would be Magisterial.They could also ask Pope Francis to do the same. -Lionel Andrades

https://www.ncronline.org/news/vatican/pope-francis-approves-further-clarifications-latin-mass-restrictions-ensure-adherence