Pope Paul VI interpreted Vatican Council II with the False Premise instead of the Rational Premise and this was the smoke of Satan. All the popes who followed, repeated the mistake. The Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith, Vatican still does not correct the error.

 

Pope Paul VI interpreted Vatican Council II with the False Premise instead of the Rational Premise and this was the smoke of Satan. All the popes who followed, repeated the mistake. The Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith, Vatican still does not correct the error.

It was Pope Pius XII who interpreted the baptism of desire and invincible ignorance with the Fake Premise instead of the Rational Premise, in the Letter of the Holy Office 1949.

Pope John XXIII and Pope John Paul I, did not correct the mistake when they were cardinals, and neither when they were popes.

When Vatican Council II is interpreted with the Rational Premise then the Church returns to the past theology and ecclesiology. Since LG 8, LG 14, LG 16, UR 3, NA 2, GS 22 etc, are not practical exceptions for extra ecclesiam nulla salus  ( with no exceptions), the Syllabus of Errors ( with no exceptions), the Athanasius Creed, outside the Church there is no salvation ( with no exceptions), the Catechism of Pope Pius X, (24Q,27Q),outside the Church there is no salvation ( with no exceptions).

Pope Paul VI also did not correct the mistake in the Letter of the Holy Office 1949.That Letter influenced Vatican Council II and changed the theology in the Catholic Church.

Today Cardinal Godfried Daneels and Roberto dei 

Mattei interpret Vatican Council II with the same 

Fake Premise and so there are exceptions for the 

Nicene Creed, the Athanasius Creed etc, which 

were interpreted with no known exceptions, before the 1940’s.-Lionel Andrades