Fr.Giacomo D’Aorta OM, Parish Priest at the Basilica of Sant Andrea della
Fratte, Rome must announce that Vatican Council II is to be interpreted with
only the Rational Premise. We will then have the Catholic Faith of St. Maximillian
Kolbe and Fr. Alphonse Ratisbonne and not Garibaldi and the Partito
Democratico.
The Minim Fathers are at the basilica where Alphonse Ratisbonne saw Our
Lady .In a flash she showed him the beauty of the Catholic Church and its
importance for the salvation of all people. But the Minims have changed the meaning
of the Creeds with the False Premise with which they also interpret Vatican
Council II. This is a mortal sin of faith. This was not the faith of St.
Maximillian Kolbe and Alphonse Ratisbonne.
1. I, Lionel, believe in one known baptism for the forgiveness of sins,
it is the baptism of water. I do not believe in three visible baptisms (desire,
blood, invincible ignorance) which exclude the baptism of water (and so are
practical exceptions for extra ecclesiam nulla salus, the Syllabus of Errors
and the Athanasius Creed). The Minim Fathers cannot say the same. Our
Profession of Faith is different.
2.I believe all need to be members of the Catholic Church for salvation
( Athanasius Creed) and there are no known exceptions in 1965-2021.For the
Minim Fathers and Sisters, LG 8, LG 14, LG 16, UR 3, NA 2, GS 22 etc in Vatican Council II are exceptions for
EENS. So they have rejected the original understanding of the Athanasius and
Nicene Creed. This is a common mortal sin of faith.
3. I believe in one, holy, Catholic and Apostolic Church (Nicene Creed)
which says outside the Church there is no salvation. There are no exceptions
for me. The Minim Fathers and Sisters would affirm the Four Marks of the Church
but with exceptions.
4. For me the First Commandment says I am the Lord your God thou shalt
have no other God but me. We worship God in only the Catholic Church. There are
no known exceptions of the baptism of desire and invincible ignorance etc for me.
For the Minims there are exceptions. It would be the same mortal sin of faith
for Fr. Giacomo D’Aorta.
5. Now there are two interpretations of Vatican Council II, one is
rational and the other is irrational. I choose the rational option. Most
Catholics like the Minims of St. Francis of Paula choose the irrational
version.
The Italian Parish Priest at the Basilica of Sant Andrea della Fratte,
Rome, a Marian sanctuary in Italy, must announce that he interprets Vatican
Council II with only the Rational Premise and that he rejects the False Premise. In the past he has always been politically
correct with a vague Christocentrism and avoided proclaiming traditional
Ecclesiocentrism. How can a Parish Priest, a juridical person, recognized in
Canon Law, interpret the Creeds irrationally, and reject their original meaning ? How can he interpret the First
Commandment heretically and schismatically ? How can he re-interpret Vatican Council II
with a False instead of a Rational Premise creating schism with the past
Magisterium of the Catholic Church?-Lionel Andrades
DECEMBER 14, 2021
DECEMBER 13, 2021
When Vatican Council II is interpreted rationally then the Parish Priest at the Basilica of Sant Andrea della Fratte, Rome, Fr.Giacomo Maria D’Orta O.M, would be affirming the same faith as Alphonse Ratisbonne
When Vatican Council II is interpreted rationally then the Parish Priest at the Basilica of Sant Andrea della Fratte, Rome, Fr.Giacomo Maria D’Orta O.M, would be affirming the same faith as Alphonse Ratisbonne.-Lionel Andrades
https://www.madonnadelmiracolo.it/contatti/
https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2021/12/when-vatican-council-ii-is-interpreted.html
Posts
No comments:
Post a Comment