The interpretation of Vatican Council II with the False Premise has altered the faith and interrupted living tradition.It is only with the use of the False Premise in the interpretation of Vatican Council II that there could be a new lex orandi in the Church which is a break with the Pontificale Romanum and the Roman Ritual in its pre-Pope Paul VI editions.

 However, let me clarify one important matter. The liturgy is never simply a matter of personal tastes or preferences. It is the lex orandi of the Church, which in faithfulness to the tradition received from Apostolic times, is determined by the Church and not by individual members. The Roman Missal of the saintly Popes, Paul VI and John Paul II, is witness to an unaltered faith and uninterrupted and living tradition.-Archbishop Roche on ‘Traditionis Custodes’ and Its Guidelines: ‘The Litugical Possibilities Are in Place’ December 23, 2021

https://www.ncregister.com/interview/archbishop-roche-on-traditionis-custodes-and-its-guidelines-the-litugical-possibilities-are-in-place

Lionel : This is false. It is only with the use of the False Premise in the interpretation of Vatican Council II that there could be a new lex orandi in the Church which is a break with the Pontificale Romanum and the Roman Ritual in its pre-Pope Paul VI editions. If Vatican Council II is interpreted with the Rational Premise there is no break with the past exclusivist ecclesiology of the Catholic Church. So the lex orandi would be the same. There would not be any theological opening for a ‘new Magisterium’, ‘reforms of Vatican Council II’, ‘new revelation’ etc.

The Roman Missal of the saintly Popes, Paul VI and John Paul II, is witness to an unaltered faith and uninterrupted and living tradition.

Their interpretation of Vatican Council II with the False Premise has altered the faith and interrupted living tradition. In the past the Church taught outside the Church there is no salvation and now it teaches outside the Church there is salvation. In the past the popes affirmed the Athanasius Creed now Pope Benedict and Pope Francis reject the Athanasius Creed. In the past there could only be an exclusivist ecumenism and the popes supported the Syllabus of Errors of Pope Pius IX. Now there is a New Ecumenism which rejects the Syllabus of Errors and the Catechism of the Council of Trent. These are only some examples of an altered faith, which was made possible with the use of a false premise in the interpretation of the baptism of desire, baptism of blood and invincible ignorance, the Nicene Creed ( I believe in one baptism for the forgiveness of sins), the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus, with no exceptions, as it was known to the missionaries and Magisterium of the 12^th to 16 the century etc,etc.-Lionel Andrades