Archbishop Marcel Lefebvre made a mistake on Vatican Council II. He used a False Premise like the liberals, to interpret the Council. Now his followers are not correcting the error. They do not caution new readers of his books.

 

OCTOBER 29, 2021

Archbishop Marcel Lefebvre made a mistake on Vatican Council II. He used a False Premise like the liberals, to interpret the Council. Now his followers are not correcting the error. They do not caution new readers of his books.

 

Archbishop Marcel Lefebvre made a mistake on Vatican Council II. He used a False Premise like the liberals, to interpret the Council. Now his followers are not correcting the error. They do not caution new readers of his books.

Michael Matt’s Remnant News does not make this correction and neither does the Angelus Presds of the Society of St. Pius X (SSPX).

KAROL WOJTYLA

The same objective error in the interpretation of Vatican Council II is there in the  books of Michael Davies, Dietrich von Hildebrand, Roberto dei Mattei and Chris Ferarra.Vatican Council II was also interpreted with the False Premise by Karol Wojtyla, Joseph Ratzinger, Karl Rahner, Yves Congar and Alfredo Ottaviani.

There many books are now obsolete since we can interpret Vatican Council II with the Rational Premise. Catholics have an option today.Why should we interpret the Council like the Lefebvrists and liberals and create a rupture with the past exclusivist ecclesiology ?- Lionel Andrades

 OCTOBER 28, 2021

We are no more in the times of Archbishop Marcel Lefebvre and Michael Davies.They made a mistake on Vatican Council II and EENS

Remnant News has a report on Yves Congar and Archbishop Marcel Lefebvre who are no more relevant to Vatican Council II since they did not know that the Council could be interpreted  with a Rational Premise and it becomes ecclesiocentric and in harmony with the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus (EENS).

Robert Morrison the Remnant Columnist, is still reading Archbishop Lefebvre’s books. No one is telling him that the Council when interpreted with the Rational Premise is traditional.

Archbishop Marcel Lefebvre did not know this when he wrote ‘I blame the Council’.Also he did not know this when he wrote, ‘Against the Heresies’.

If Michael Matt knows it he does not want to bring this information out in the public.

When Lefebvre wrote ‘An Open Letter to Confused Catholics’ he had confused LG 8, LG 14, LG 16, UR 3, NA 2,GS 22 etc as referring to invisible and not visible cases.

 There were explicit and not implicit, objective and not subjective.So his inference was wrong and conclusion non traditional.He put the blame on Vatican Council II in general, since he did not know about the Specific Error in the Council.He did not know about his False Premise.

We are no more in the times of Archbishop Marcel Lefebvre and Michael Davies.They made a mistake on Vatican Council II and EENS.-Lionel Andrades

October 24, 2021

FRANCIS, CONGAR, AND THE CASE OF ARCHBISHOP LEFEBVRE

Written by  Robert Morrison | Remnant Columnisthttps://remnantnewspaper.com/web/index.php/articles/item/5661-francis-congar-and-the-case-of-archbishop-lefebvre
https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2021/10/archbishop-marcel-lefebvre-made-mistake.html
_____________________________________________________________________

OCTOBER 28, 2021

Bishop Joseph Pfeiffer makes the common mistake on Vatican Council II

 (32:11 timing) It is the duty of the members of the Holy Mother Church, the Mystical Body of Christ to fight against the errors of Vatican Council II says Bishop Joseph Pfeiffer

Bishop Joseph Pfeiffer is referring to Vatican Council II interpreted with the False Premise he does not know about Vatican Coucil II interpreted with the Rational Premise.We do not oppose Vatican Council II interpreted with the Rational Premise since the conclusion is traditional. Vatican Council II is dogmatic and in harmony with Feeneyite extra ecclesiam nulla salus, the Syllabus of Errors of Pope Pius IX with no known exceptions and the Athanasius Creed with no known exceptions.

Vatican Council II interpreted with the Rational Premise, puts an end to theological liberalism in the Church.

Pope Paul VI did not interpret the Council with the Rational Premise.If he did use onoly the Rational Premise, there would not be the present liberalism in the Church.-Lionel Andrades

https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2021/10/bishop-joseph-pfeiffer-makes-common.html