President Sergio Mattarella's Oath of Office was as a Catholic but how can he be a Catholic when he interprets Vatican Council II with a False Premise and not the Rational Premise ? How can a Catholic interpret all Church Documents with a Fake Premise as he does ?

 

President Sergio Mattarella's Oath of Office was as a Catholic but how can he be a Catholic when he interprets Vatican Council II with a False Premise and not the Rational Premise ? How can a Catholic interpret all Church Documents with a Fake Premise as he does? It is a false Oath of Office also for members of Parliament unless they interpret Vatican Council II rationally.

A Catholic is a person who has the traditional Catholic Faith, is baptized with water and follows the teachings of the Catholic Church. How can someone be a Catholic who interprets Vatican Council II, the Creeds, Catechisms, extra ecclesiam nulla salus etc with a Fake Premise to produce an irrational, non traditional and non Catholic conclusion, as does Mattarella.

For him Lumen Gentium 16 ( being saved in invincible ignorance) refers to a visible person in 1965-2022 and so is a practical exception for the Athanasius Creed which says all need to be members of the Catholic Church ( with faith and baptism) for salvation. For me Lumen Gentium 16 refers to an invisible and hypothetical person in the present times and so is not a practical exception for the Athanasius Creed.

For Mattarella, Lumen Gentium 14 (being saved with the baptism of desire) refers to a known non Catholic saved outside the Church without faith and the baptism of water. So he rejects the Athanasius Creed, the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus etc. For me Lumen Gentium 14 refers to an unknown person and so is not an exception for the dogma EENS, the Athanasius Creed, Syllabus of Errors etc.

So for President Mattarella the Athanasius Creed, the dogma EENS and the Syllabus of Errors are obsolete and for me they are not obsolete.

How can he claim to be a Catholic when he rejects Magisterial Documents by using a False Premise (invisible people are visible)?

There are certain conditions when an election could be disqualified or a candidate elected or about to be elected is found in a moral or criminal state which disqualifies him. How can Mattarella be a Catholic, when he is not? How can he unethically interpret Church Documents and suggest that there is a break with Tradition, a Tradition which he rejects.

We have an Italian President who changes the meaning of the Nicene Creed and rejects the Athanasius Creed be given the Eucharist at Holy Mass? Silvio Berlusconi and Matteo Salvini who are divorced cannot receive the Eucharist at Holy Mass.

Without the False Premise he would have to say as a Catholic that outside the Catholic Church there is no salvation. Vatican Council II (Rational) says extra ecclesiam nulla salus.

President Mattarella interpret Vatican Council II schismatically, heretically and irrational and support the New Ecumenism, New Ecclesiology etc. In his Oath of Office this would not be ethical or coherent even by secular ethical standards.

He needs to affirm Magisterial Documents with a Rational Premise and then there would not be a rejection of Tradition as a Catholic.-Lionel Andrades