We are Catholics who affirm the teachings of the Catholic Church which do not change. Cardinal Ratzinger tried to do away with the Syllabus of Errors of Pope Pius IX by projecting invisible cases of the baptism of desire and invincible ignorance as referring to physically visible non Catholics saved outside the Church, without faith and the baptism of water (Ad Gentes 7, Vatican Council II).-Lionel Andrades
FEBRUARY 17, 2022
The Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith made an error in the 1949 Letter of the Holy Office to the Archbishop of Boston and Cardinal Luiz Ladaria sj should correct it, before he retires.
All Pope Benedict’s books were written with the False Premise. All his encyclicals and apostolic letters were not issued with him affirming the Rational Premise. He never asked new vocations to the religious life, to interpret Vatican Council II with the Rational Premise.
1.If LG 8, LG 14, LG 16, UR 3, NA 2, GS 22 in Vatican Council II refer to hypothetical and theoretical cases only in 2022 then the Council is traditional. Since it does not contradict the past ecclesiocentrism (EENS, Syllabus of Errors etc).
2.If LG 8, etc refer to objective examples of non Catholics saved outside the Church in 2022, then there are objective exceptions, for the past exclusivist ecclesiology. EENS etc are obsolete.
So if the premise is invisible people are visible then the conclusion is non-traditional if the premise is invisible people are invisible in the present times then the conclusion is traditional.
It is the same Vatican Council II before us but with two different conclusions.
The Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith(CDF) made an error in the 1949 Letter of the Holy Office to the Archbishop of Boston and Cardinal Luiz Ladaria sj should correct it, before he retires. The CDF in the Letter assumed that the baptism of desire and being saved in invincible ignorance were visible examples of salvation outside the Church. So they were wrongly projected as practical exceptions for Feeneyite EENS.
The same mistake was repeated when the present Adjunct Secretary of the CDF, Archbishop Augustine Di Noia , asked Brother Andre Marie micm, Prior at the St.Benedict Center, New Hampshire, USA, to reinterpret the Catechism of the Catholic Church ( 847-848-invincible ignorance) as being visible cases and so practical exceptions for the traditional exclusivist interpretation of EENS.-Lionel Andrades
FEBRUARY 21, 2022
Before he retires in July, Cardinal Luiz Ladaria sj, must clarify that Vatican Council II can be interpreted with a rational or irrational premise and the conclusion will be different and that Pope Benedict chose the False Premise to interpret Vatican Council II in two theological papers of the International Theological Commission.
Before he retires in July, Cardinal Luiz Ladaria sj, must clarify that Vatican Council II can be interpreted with a rational or irrational premise and the conclusion will be different and that Pope Benedict chose the False Premise to interpret Vatican Council II in two theological papers of the International Theological Commission. They are Christianity and the World Religions (1997) and The Hope of Salvation for Infants who die without being baptized (2007).Cardinal Ladaria and Bishop Charles Morerod op were officials of the ITC. The two theological papers with the objective error- confusing what is invisible as being visible- was approved by Pope Benedict. -Lionel Andrades
https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2022/02/before-he-retires-in-july-cardinal-luiz.html
FEBRUARY 22, 2022
The Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith (CDF) Assistant Secretary does not interpret Vatican Council II with the Rational Premise. Malta's seminaries, religious communities and catechists do the same
FEBRUARY 21, 2022
Malta’s bishops conferences, seminaries and religious communities are following the Assistant Secretary of the CDF Archbishop Charles Scicluna and not publically correcting the error
The Catholic Bishops Conference in Malta, like Archbishop Charles Scicluna, the Adjunct Secretary of the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith, Vatican, is interpreting Vatican Council II with the irrational and not rational premise, and the conclusion is nontraditional instead of traditional. Malta’s bishops conferences, seminaries and religious communities are following the Assistant Secretary of the CDF and not publically correcting the error. -Lionel Andrades
https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2022/02/cdf-assistant-secretary-does-not.html
Posts
No comments:
Post a Comment