Pope Francis met the Superior General of the Society of St. Pius X it is reported. Both of them interpret Vatican Council II and the Creeds and Catechisms with the same Irrational Premise. It is public and official. In only this way they both produce a theological rupture with Tradition (Syllabus of Errors, extra ecclesiam nulla salus of the 16th century, Athanasius Creed etc)

 

Pope Francis met the Superior General of the Society of St. Pius X it is reported. Both of them interpret Vatican Council II and the Creeds and Catechisms with the same Irrational Premise. It is public and official. In only this way they both produce a theological rupture with Tradition (Syllabus of Errors, extra ecclesiam nulla salus of the 16^th century, Athanasius Creed etc).Pope Francis is a liberal. The SSPX position is confusing. They both show us that the Novus Ordo Mass and the Latin Mass are not the cause of the hermeneutic of rupture with Tradition.

At the SSPX-Vatican doctrinal talks during the pontificate of Pope Benedict, both groups were using the same False Premise. Cardinal Ladaria represented the Vatican side and Fr. Jean Marie Gleize the SSPX team. At that time all the books and encyclicals of Pope Benedict were written with a False and not Rational Premise. The SSPX did not object. How could they do so? Their priests also had written books and articles critical of Vatican Council II but interpreting the Council with the False and not Rational Premise. -Lionel Andrades