The editors of Il Messaggero, la Reppublica, Correira della Serra and daily Avvenire interpret Vatican Council II with an Irrational and not Rational Premise. There reports on the Council are naive.
WHAT IS THE RATIONAL PREMISE?
The Catechism of the Catholic Church 846 says outside
the Church there is no salvation and we know that there are no physically
visible cases of being saved with the baptism of desire and invincible
ignorance in 1965-2022.So CCC 847-848 (invincible ignorance) is not a practical
exception for CCC 846.This is the rational approach. Invisible cases of being
saved in invincible ignorance are invisible in 2022.This is the Rational Premise
(invisible cases are invisible).The Irrational Premise is invisible cases are
visible. LG 16 refers to a physically visible case in 2022.
So with the Rational Premise CCC 847-848 does not
contradict CCC 846 or the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus, the Syllabus of
Errors and the Athanasius Creed. It is in harmony with the past Magisterium.
There is no schism or heresy with the Rational Premise.
There is a hermeneutic of continuity with Tradition (EENS
etc) when the Rational Premise is chosen. EENS today is the same as it was the
for Jesuits in the 16the century since there are no practical exceptions
mentioned in Vatican Council II.There is no development of doctrine. The ecclusivist ecclesiology of the Catholic
Church in the Patristic period and the Middle Ages is the same as today with
Vatican Council II interpreted with the Rational Premise. There is no rupture
with the ecclesiology and theology of Holy Mass today in all rites today and that of
the Roman Missal over the centuries, before 1965.
- Lionel Andrades
DECEMBER 7, 2020
If Prof. Alberto Melloni of the Bologna School would interpret Vatican Council II without the false premise of the New Theology, the Italian Government may not continue to finance him.He would be taking the Catholic Church back to Tradition
If Prof. Alberto Melloni of the Bologna School would interpret Vatican Council II without the false premise of the New Theology, the Italian Government may not continue to finance him.He would be taking the Catholic Church back to Tradition. -Lionel Andrades
John XXIII Foundation for Religious Sciences (FSCIRE), the "Bologna School, interprets Vatican Council II with the common false premise.There is no transparency on this issue
FEBRUARY 22, 2020
JANUARY 3, 2020
John XXIII Foundation for Religious Sciences (FSCIRE), the "Bologna School, interprets Vatican Council II with the common false premise.There is no transparency on this issue
ATHANASIUS CREED
___________________________________
WEDNESDAY, JUNE 24, 2020
Pope Francis interprets the Creeds with a false premise, inference and conclusion. This was un precedented over the centuries.
Pope Francis interprets the Creeds with a false premise, inference and conclusion. This was un precedented over the centuries.
______________________________
MARCH 5, 2020
All the books in Italy which cite Vatican Council II, in general are in error, since the Council is interpreted with a false premise, inference and conclusion. So it is wrong for the Italian Government to annually finance the Fondazione per le scienze religiose Giovanni XXIII( Bologna School )of Alberto Melloni. He receives about a million a year it is reported.
http://www.fscire.it/index.php/en/series/the-history-of-vatican-ii/
_________________________
La Scuola di Bologna sul Concilio Vaticano II dello storico Alberto Melloni è finanziata ogni anno dal governo di sinistra italiano quando interpreta il Concilio con una irrazionale premessa, inferenza e conclusione per respingere il dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus se è stato interpretato nel papi Italiani nel corso dei secoli.
-Lionel Andrades
No comments:
Post a Comment