The FSSP communiqué misses the point.The issue is Vatican Council II and the False Premise and not just the missal.

 

The FSSP communiqué misses the point.The issue is Vatican Council II and the False Premise and not just the missal.Today for Pope Francis and Pope Benedict and for priests at large there is a new theology at Holy Mass and for those priests who use the Roman Missal and reject Vatican Council II(Irrational) and who have not heard about Vatican Council II( Rational), there still is the ‘old theology’.

Pope Francis and Pope Benedict interpret Vatican Council II with the Irrational and not Rational Premise (like Pope Paul VI and Pope John Paul II) and so their conclusion is non-traditional instead of traditional. The Council is a rupture and not a continuation with Tradition. This is irrespective if they use the Roman Missal or that of Pope Paul VI. It is the False Premise which creates the break with traditional theology and ecclesiology and not the missal or the liturgy.

Their theology and ecclesiology is determined by the common use of the Fake Premise to re interpret Magisterial Documents.

This is a break with the 16^th century or the Patristic period when they use a rational premise (invisible people are invisible) and so there was the traditional theology, the old theology.

So I repeat for Pope Francis and Pope Benedict and for priests at large there is a new theology at Holy Mass and for those priests who use the Roman Missal and reject Vatican Council II(Irrational) and who have not heard about Vatican Council II( Rational), there still is the ‘old theology’.-Lionel Andrades