At the Los Angeles Catholic Conference they were all in general, interpreting Vatican Council II with the False Premise and so was Bishop Barron. So there was a fake and artificial rupture with Tradition.

 

It’s unethical by secular standards for Bishop Robert Barron and Dr. Larry Chapp to use a False Premise to interpret Vatican Council II. I affirm Vatican Council II with a Rational Premise. I avoid the False Premise.

Bishop Barron interprets Vatican Council II with the Fake Premise emerges a liberal and then holds a talk with Jordan Peterson.

For Bishop Barron Lumen Gentium 16 contradicts the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus (EENS) and the Syllabus of Errors of Pope Pius IX (ecumenism of return to the Church/ outside the Church no salvation). For me it does not contradict these Magisterial Documents. Since they always refer to hypothetical and invisible cases in the present times (2022).There are no known cases of non Catholics saved outside the Catholic Church. So there are no practical exceptions for Tradition. (Catechism of Pope Pius X, Athanasius Creed etc).

At the Los Angeles Catholic Conference they were all in general, interpreting Vatican Council II with the False Premise and so was Bishop Barron. So there was a fake and artificial rupture with Tradition.  -Lionel Andrades