Cardinal Luiz Ladaria is expected as Prefect of the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith, Vatican, to
interpret Vatican Council II with the Rational Premise and not the common False
Premise.He is presently dishonest. With the Rational Premise there is no rupture with
the pre-1949 Magisterium of the Catholic Church.
He also needs to correct the mistake of Pope Pius XII in the Letter of the Holy Office 1949 to the Archbishop of Boston.He confused unknown cases of the baptism of desire and being saved in invincible ignorance as being known and objective exceptions for extra ecclesiam nulla salus (EENS), according to the missionaries of the 16th century.
This mistake was repeated by subsequent popes, who confused invisible cases as
being visible. Then this confusion was projected as being practical exceptions
for extra ecclesiam nulla salus, the Syllabus of Errors of Pope Pius IX and the
Athanasius Creed.So the past ecclesiocentrism was made obsolete.
Pope Paul VI could have interpreted
Vatican Council II with the Rational Premise and the Council would be
traditional. Vatican Council II would affirm the past exclusivist ecclesiology of
the Church. There would be no break with traditional ecclesiocentrism.There would be no practical exceptions mentioned in the Council-text for the past exclusivist ecclesiology of the Catholic Church.
The Letter of the Holy Office 1949 was heretical and schismatic when it suggested that unknown cases of the baptism of desire and invincible ignorance were practical and known exceptions for traditional EENS.But the error was incorported into the Denzinger and then referenced in Vatican Council II and the Catechism of the Catholic Church.
I-Lionel Andrades
No comments:
Post a Comment