Sunday, May 8, 2022

The Vatican Secretary and Assistant Secretary of the Congregation for Divine Worshop and Andrea Grillo and the Pontifical Liturgical Institute of St. Anselm University, Rome, are unethical and dishonest when they interpret Vatican Council II and other Magisterial Documents with the False Premise to create division in the Catholic Church

 





The Vatican Secretary and Assistant Secretary of the Congregation for Divine Worshop and Andrea Grillo and the Pontifical Liturgical Institute of St. Anselm University, Rome, are unethical and dishonest when they interpret Vatican Council II and other Magisterial Documents with the False Premise to create a break with the past ecclesiology of the Catholic Church. This is creating division in the Church.

Pope Francis addressed members of the Pontifical Liturgical Institute of the Benedictine University of St. Anselm.They all interpret Vatican Council II and other Magisterial Documents with a False Premise.This creates ecclesial unity, with liberalism and division with the past Magisterium. -Lionel Andrades

__________________________________



MARCH 8, 2014

Critics of TLM with 'idealogy' of extra ecclesiam nulla salus speak at Liturgical Course in Rome

A part of a course on the liturgy for priests and seminarians  has been organised by the Liturgical Office of the Rome Vicariate and the Pontifical Institute of the Liturgy, University of St. Anselm,Rome. On March 13, Fr.Keith Pecklers S.J is to speak.
 
 Mons. Arthur Roche, Secretary of the Congregation for Divine Worship and the Discipline of the Sacraments ,Vatican gave a talk last Feb 13,2013 as part of these series at St.Anselm.
 
Feast of the Assumption_05Mons. Arthur Roche and Fr.Keith Pecklers , offer Holy Mass denying the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus and  interpreting Vatican Council II with an irrational premise. So the pastoral Vatican Council II emerges dogmatic . Since irrationally assuming one can see the dead saved in invincible ignorance (LG 16) etc results in a negation of the ex cathedra dogma on exclusive salvation, the dogma on the infallibility of the pope ex cathedra, the Syllabus of Errors etc.
 
Those priests who do not interpret Vatican Council II as such are not allowed to offer the Traditional Latin Mass.
 
 Fr.Keith Pecklers could be incardinated ,if he wanted, in the diocese of Bishop Michael Olson and  be allowed to offer the TLM there. However Fr.Nicholas Gruner would not be able to be incardinated there or allowed to offer the TLM  at Fischer More College.Since he does not accept the irrationality of being able to see the dead on earth saved,  who are visible  exceptions to Tradition in 2014.
 
This is the New Revelation (allegedly from God) which has come into the Catholic Church and which all priests must accept to offer the TLM.
 
The New Revelation is accepted by the Jesuit priests  and Spiritual Directors  at the Pontifical Gregorian University, Rome where Fr.Pecklers teaches.
 
 It is also accepted by Mons. Arthur Roche  the former Bishop of Leeds, England where  no one in the diocese curia or offices  was willing to affirm the extra ecclesiam nulla salus in my communication with them a few years back.


Fr.Pecklers objected in the media to the Good Friday Prayer for the Conversion of the Jews and has been a critic of the TLM.Mons. Roche will permit the TLM to be offered but without the 'ideology' of extra ecclesiam nulla salus . Both of them are denying the dogma on salvation, changing the Nicene Creed and offering Holy Mass in the vernacular in this condition of heresy.
-Lionel Andrades
 
Why Fr.Nicholas Gruner cannot offer the TLM in public at Fischer More College
http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2014/03/why-frnicholas-gruner-cannot-offer-tlm.html#links

_________________________________________

 AUGUST 11, 2013

At thePontifical Institute of Liturgy, San Anselmo University, Rome Benedictine priest-professors, offer Holy Mass negating the Nicene and Athanasius Creed.

At the Pontifical Institute of Liturgy, San Anselmo University, Rome  Benedictine priest-professors, offer Holy Mass negating the Nicene and Athanasius  Creed.
 
'The Institute was canonically established by the Apostolic See as  a faculty of Sacred Liturgy of the Pontifical University of St.Anselm in order to promote liturgical science through research and teaching.' According to a  brochure of the Institute ' it is empowered to grant, in the name of the Holy Father, the academic degrees of License and Doctorate in liturgy (Statutes 127). The programme of studies considers the Eucharistic(sic), the sacraments and sacramentals , the liturgy of the Hours and the Liturgical year under their theological, historical , spiritual and political aspects.'
 
 So they promote  a theological  understanding of the Holy Mass.

 Since theologically they interpret magisterial documents not according to Fr.Leonard Feeney, but Cardinal Richard Cushing , they assume there are  known exceptions to the traditional interpretation of the Nicene and Athansius Creed. They also extend this irrationality to Vatican Council II. Having changed the Creed, which is a first class heresy, they offer Holy Mass. This is a mortal sin for those who know  and yet  persist in this error.
 
Benedictine priest-professors at the pontifical Institute of the Liturgy, St.Anselm are in mortal sin.
 
Theologically, St.Benedict ,St.Anselm and other saints did not assume there are three known baptisms for the forgiveness of sinThe Nicene  Creed says there is only one (known )baptism. Neither did the Benedictine saints negate the Athansius  Creed by saying outside the Church there is (known) salvation instead of 'outside the Church there is no salvation.'
 
The liturgical Institute today not only negates monastic spirituality but also the present Catechism of the Catholic Church (846) which states all need to enter the Church 'as through a door'. The Catechism (846) cites AG 7 which states  all need 'faith and baptism' for salvation.
 
 For the priests -professors all in 2013 do not need Catholic faith and the baptism of water for salvation. Since there are known exceptions of invincible ignorance  and being saved with the baptism of desire.
 
Since these cases are allegedly known to them they are  exceptions to the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus . Only if there are known exceptions , physically visible in the present times, can there be exceptions to Tradition, the dogma on salvation and the Syllabus of Errors.
 
Since the Institute negates the defined dogma on salvation, with these known exceptions , they are implying  that there are three known baptisms for the forgiveness  of sin.The traditional meaning in the Nicene Creed has been changed.
 
So if the salvation dogma is contradicted with known baptism of desire and blood , and being saved in invincible ignorance in 2013  then the Creed is contradicted when it says there is one (known) baptism for the forgiveness of sin.
-Lionel Andrades


Monastic spirituality at San Anselmo University is irrational and so a break with the faith of the first centuries.  

http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2013/08/monastic-spirituality-at-san-anselmo.html#links

_____________________________________

AUGUST 28, 2012

When they interpret Vatican Council II according to Cushingism and not Fr. Leonard Feeney it has its influence on the liturgy

When they interpret Vatican Council II according to Cushingism and not Fr. Leonard Feeney then they believe there is salvation outside the Church. So they are 'open' to Protestants, homosexuals...Masons. It has its influence on the Eucharist and the Liturgy.

http://rorate-caeli.blogspot.com/2012/08/a-vatican-ii-moment-masonic-memorial.html

http://eponymousflower.blogspot.it/2012/08/satanic-mockery-in-brazil.html

In Rome the priests who offer the Traditional Latin Mass (TLM) interpret Vatican Council II according to the Richard Cushing Error and are not willing to affirm the dogma outside the Church there is no salvation. They interpret LG 16 as an exception to the dogma on exclusive salvation  and then assume that there is salvation outside the Church. This is the liberal interpretation of Vatican Council II according to Cardinal Richard Cushing and the secular left media.
If there is salvation outside the Church then it means the Protestant is going to be saved even though he aborts, contraceps and divorces, so why cannot Catholics so the same ? If there is salvation outside the Catholic Church then why cannot we use a non Catholic liturgy?Can Masons be saved? Why not give the Eucharist to practising homosexuals at Mass as it is being done in London ?
Priests who offer the TLM are not willing to affirm the dogma in public. Even Rorate Caeli is afraid, possibly there are objections from Masons within and outside the Church. May be the priests in the photos are responding to the same pressures.-Lionel Andrades
 _______________________________________________

SSPX CAN ACCEPT VATICAN COUNCIL II WITH EXTRA ECCLESIAM NULLA SALUS ACCORDING TO FR.LEONARD FEENEY AND NOT RICHARD CUSHING
Vatican Council II says outside the Church there is no salvation and is in agreement with the Syllabus of Errors, Mystici Corporis,Quanto Conficiamus etc.
A priest has criticizied the SSPX Chapter communique for saying outside the church there is no salvation ‘nor possibility to find the means leading to salvation’ since he assumes those saved in invincible ignorance etc are exceptions to the dogma on exclusive salvation.
http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2012/08/vatican-council-ii-affirms-extra.html#links

LIKE I SAID IN ROME THEY DON'T PROCLAIM THE GOSPEL IN HOMILIES AND PUBLICATIONS  http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2012/08/like-i-said-in-rome-they-dont-proclaim.html    http://youtu.be/Im7PMtF-QVc



 

No comments: