Bishops have to permit the Latin Mass only for those who interpret the Council rationally and so support the 1962 Roman Missal: there now are two doctrinal interpretations of Traditionis Custode

Brother Andre Marie MICM Prior at the St.Benedict Center, Richmond, New Hampshire interprets Vatican Council II with the Rational Premise and so his interpretation of Traditionis Custode would be different from that of Pope Francis and Cardinal Ladaria who use the False Premise.

Pope Francis’ Traditionis Custode should only be interpreted with generally acceptable reasoning. Otherwise it is dishonest and unethical.

Governments must only interpret Vatican Council II with the Rational Premise. This must be the norm in educational institutions etc.

So the bishops have to permit the Latin Mass only for those who interpret the Council rationally and so support the 1962 Roman Missal.This is the only ethical option.

Students and teachers must only interpret LG 8,LG 14,LG 16,UR 3, NA 2,GS 22 etc in Vatican Council II, as referring to hypothetical and invisible cases in the present times ( 1965-2022).

DOCTRINAL CONFUSION WITH TRADITIONIS CUSTODE

Presently there is confusion with Traditionis Custode. Bishops interpret LG 8,LG 14,LG 16, UR3,NA 2, GS 22 etc as being exceptions for the dogma EENS, the Athanasius Creed and the Syllabus of Errors. So they imply that LG 8 etc refer to personally known non Catholics saved outside the Church (they would have to be known and visible to be exceptions). Invisible people cannot be exceptions.

For me LG 8 etc are not visible cases of non Catholics saved in invincible ignorance (LG 16) and the baptism of desire (LG 14) in 2022.

So for the bishops (but not me) there are practical exceptions for the past ecclesiocentrism of the Catholic Church (Cantate Domino, Council of Florence 1441 etc).They are telling the world invisible people are visible.

This is not our human reality. Invisible people cannot be visible examples of salvation outside the Catholic Church last year or this year.

This is irrational and even non Catholics, including professors and politicians, are repeating this error at secular institutions.

The Federal Ministry of Education in Germany, Hungary, Poland and France, for example, must show the Catholic bishops and people at large that LG 8 etc refer to invisible cases in our reality, always. So always they are not objective examples of salvation outside the Church. This must be the official position of the Ministries of Education etc in different countries.

THIS IS A SECULAR ISSUE

This is a secular issue when invisible people are assumed to be physically visible and new philosophies and a theology is created based upon this objective error. The premise is irrational for everyone, irrespective of his religion or education.

A person could be free to believe what he wants but the government must not interpret Vatican Council II irrationally by confusing what is invisible as being visible and hypothetical as being objective and then projecting this objective mistake as being socially acceptable.

A pope is not Magisterial when he interprets Church Documents with a False Premise and knows that there will be a rupture with the past Magisterium of the Church, inspired by the Holy Spirit.

From the secular point of view an objective and factual error must not be accepted in the schools, universities etc.

HOLY SPIRIT CANNOT TEACH AN OBJECTIVE ERROR

  A recent stage of this dynamic was constituted by Vatican Council II where the Catholic episcopate came together to listen and to discern the path for the Church indicated by the Holy Spirit. To doubt the Council is to doubt the intentions of those very Fathers who exercised their collegial power in a solemn manner cum Petro et sub Petro in an ecumenical council, and, in the final analysis, to doubt the Holy Spirit himself who guides the Church.- Letter of Pope Francis which accompanies TraditionisCustodehttps://www.vatican.va/content/francesco/en/letters/2021/documents/20210716-lettera-vescovi-liturgia.html

 

Every Catholic and both the popes must accept Vatican Council II. They must only accept Vatican Council II interpreted rationally. The Holy Spirit cannot teach error. But Pope Francis does not accept Vatican Council II interpreted with a Rational Premise.

The Holy Spirit cannot guide the Church to use the False Premise, ‘the Red Column’ to interpret the Council.

When Pope Francis cited Vatican Council II (irrational) to justify Amoris Laetitia it was wrong.

When he cited Vatican Council II (irrational) to justify the Abu Dhabi Statement it was wrong.

When Pope Benedict cited Vatican Council II (irrational) to reject Traditional Mission based upon exclusive salvation in the Church, it was wrong.

MORTAL SINS THE SAME AFTER VATICAN COUNCIL II (RATIONAL)

Vatican Council II interpreted rationally takes the Catholic Church back to the old theology upon which was based traditional faith and morals. So we know that adultery, fornication, immodesty, abortion, contraception, homosexual marriages, pornography, concubinage, divorce, inter-faith marriages, drug abuse etc are still mortal sins and they take a person to the fires of Hell for all eternity. There is no change in the ecclesiology of the Catholic Church after Vatican Council II ( rational).The effect of these sins are removed from the soul through repentance in the Sacrament of Confession.

-Lionel Andrades