Thursday, June 30, 2022

Coetus International Summorum Pontificum and their affiliated groups are organizing events in Rome without addressing the issue of the False Premise being used by all their members to interpret Vatican Council II.

 Coetus International Summorum Pontificum and their affiliated groups are organizing events in Rome in October without addressing the issue of the False Premise being used by their members to interpret Vatican Council II. This was the mistake of Archbishop Marcel Lefebvre, Michael Davies and others at the times of the Council.

The error can be corrected today.

It would mean that Coetus would have to interpret Vatican Council II with the Rational Premise and then affirm 16th century extra ecclesiam nulla salus with no known exceptions.

At the time of the Amazon Synod historian Robert dei Mattei was interpreting Vatican Council II like the liberal cardinals and bishops at the Synod.Both were using the False Premise to create objective exceptions for Feeneyite extra ecclesiam nulla salus.

Presently Una Voce International and the SSPX bishops will affirm extra ecclesiam nulla salus, like the liberals and the present two popes, only, with there being alleged practical exceptions in the present times for EENS. So every body needs to enter the Church they says and they also say that there are exceptions and not everone needs to enter the Church. The liberals also speak the same way.

Those who will be participating in the three day event in Rome include Nuestra Senora de la Cristiandad, Spain, Federatio Internationalis Una Voce France, Latin Mass Society of England and Wales and Coetus Internationalis Summorum Pontificum.-Lionel Andrades 






http://blog.messainlatino.it/2022/06/alla-scoperta-dei-membri-del-coetus_01270738391.html

http://blog.messainlatino.it/2022/04/alla-scoperta-dei-membri-del-coetus_01954142890.html




JUNE 30, 2022




There are two interpretations of the apostolic exhortation Desiderio Desideravi

https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2022/06/there-are-two-interpretations-of_30.html

No comments: